A GOLDEN eagle that went missing in January was almost certainly illegally killed, according to new data uncovered by campaigners and scientists.
Transmissions from a GPS satellite tag worn by the bird, who was named Fred, suddenly stopped when he was near a grouse moor on the Pentland Hills. Three days later, it briefly began transmitting again from a position in the North Sea, 15 miles off the coast of St Andrews. The discovery led to a furious row between campaigners and gamekeepers.
Now, analysis of new GPS data, recovered by the tag’s manufacturer, has seemingly shed new light on what happened to Fred.
In the hours after his death, Fred, or certainly his tag, was taken away from the Pentlands, along the Edinburgh City Bypass and the A1 towards Haddington, before travelling to North Berwick. The tag then passed mobile phone masts on the coast of Fife.
Campaigners say it is not inconceivable to suggest someone killed Fred, put him in the boot of their car and then threw him into the sea. Broadcaster and campaigner Chris Packham said: “We don’t know whether this tag was still attached to Fred as it travelled across East Lothian and into the North Sea, but we do know that the tag’s movements are a clear indication of foul play.
“Whether it was an attempt to mask the illegal killing of Fred by dumping the tag, and possibly Fred, in the North Sea to make it look like he had drowned, we’ll never know. We do know that, once again, we’ve lost a young golden eagle in the vicinity of a grouse moor.”
Packham called on the Scottish Government to do more to protect Scotland’s birds of prey. He said: “It’s crystal clear that raptors continue to be killed and the criminals responsible think they are untouchable.”
Dr Ruth Tingay of the organisation Raptor Persecution said: “That someone might have been travelling around the Edinburgh City Bypass with a dead golden eagle in the boot of a vehicle is sickening.
“These new tags we’re using to track golden eagles like Fred offer a highly sophisticated technical opportunity, not just to learn about the eagles’ movements when they’re alive but also, it seems, an insight into the lengths someone will go to try to remove evidence to cover their crime.”
Last year, a Scottish Government-commissioned report showed that 41 of 131 satellite-tagged golden eagles had disappeared in mysterious circumstances in Scotland.
A spokesman for the Scottish Gamekeepers Association said: “The SGA repeats its previous message. If anyone knows anything, contact the only authority able to deal with such information, the police.
“If persecution is at play, we condemn that. If this is found to be anything to do with any of our members – and we have no reason whatsoever to believe it is – they will be removed from our organisation.”
David Johnstone, chairman of landowners’ body Scottish Land & Estates, said: “Once again, we would urge anyone with information to make it known to Police Scotland as soon as possible. Everyone wants to establish the facts in this case. We condemn all forms of wildlife crime.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel