IT was heartening to read John Swinney’s comment piece about Scotland’s new approach to childhood trauma, based on research into adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) (Scotland is taking a new approach on childhood trauma, The National, March 26). This research shows that experiences such as neglect, violence in the home and physical or emotional abuse during children’s early years have adverse long-term consequences in terms of physical and mental health, and are also correlated with early mortality.
Mr Swinney states that the Scottish Government is determined to do everything possible to “prevent adverse childhood experiences in the first place, and where they do happen, to reduce their negative impact”.
In UN and Scottish policy documents “the early years” are defined as the period between birth and eight years of age, described by Unesco as “a time of remarkable growth with brain development at its peak [during which] children are highly influenced by the environment and the people that surround them”. There is now a great deal of medical and neuroscientific research showing that children in this age group benefit from positive, supportive relationships with adults and plenty of opportunities for active, self-directed play, as often as possible outdoors.
All European countries except those in the UK therefore provide relationship-centred, play-based kindergarten education until children are at least six.
There is, in fact, international evidence that a too-early start on schooling (with an emphasis on literacy and numeracy skills) is an ACE. Long-term studies have shown that, like the other ACEs mentioned above, formal education before the age of six correlates with poorer overall educational success, problems during mid-life with health and relationships, and early mortality. This is why Upstart Scotland is campaigning for the introduction of a Nordic-style kindergarten stage for children aged three to seven.
We therefore urge Mr Swinney to look at the recent evidence about early-years education, reverse the Scottish Government’s decision to test children in literacy and numeracy skills at the age of five, and introduce a relationship-centred, play-based kindergarten stage with plenty of opportunities for children to learn and play outdoors.
Sue Palmer
Chair, Upstart Scotland
I AM delighted to see your “campaign” calling on readers to order their copy of The National from their newsagents in a bid to counter attempts by some outlets to deliberately hide copies from view and then claim “there’s no demand for it.”
This is a deliberate attempt by pro-Union supporters to censor what nearly half of Scotland thinks, is an affront to democracy and free speech, and testifies to the fact that there’s not much positive to say about the Union in Scotland. If there was, Unionists would not have to rely on their stock-in-trade tactics of distortion, censorship and bias.
However, I do not fully agree with The National when you claim there’s not much that can be done about it.
I myself have written to the chief executive of the Co-op in Manchester objecting to this censorship by his staff, who clearly do not want their customers to be able to read anything other than Unionist media. I also approached the manager of my local Co-op.
If every National reader were to write to all the major retailers who indulge in this practice, potentially their mailboxes will be overloaded.
Peter Jeal
Dalbeattie
I WRITE to congratulate Donald Anderson of Glasgow (Letters, March 27). His letter should be a wake-up call for all of us, and especially those who have power and influence over education.
Until our own history is taught at school, instead of one watered down and anglicised, independence will remain a pipe dream. If you wish to control a country, remove its language customs and religious practices and rewrite its history. I am sad to say the last 300 years has gone a long way to achieve this.
As a long-time supporter of independence and SNP member, I feel we are getting further away from our goal unless we promote our own history – warts and all – within our education system.
I remember my school days, and Scottish history was hardly mentioned. It was only my personal search for truth that enlightened me as to our own story.
Bryan Auchterlonie
Perth
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here