RUSSIA’S Supreme Court has upheld a criminal conviction against opposition leader Alexei Navalny and his brother.
The 2014 conviction was the reason given for why Navalny was barred from running in the March presidential election.
The poll was won comfortably by incumbent Vladimir Putin.
Navalny and his brother, Oleg, were convicted in 2014 of defrauding a cosmetics company in a trial that was widely described as a political vendetta.
Following unsuccessful appeals, Navalny, a lawyer by training, turned to the European Court of Human Rights, which in 2016 ruled in his favour. Russia’s Supreme Court, however, ruled yesterday against a retrial, upholding the conviction that gave Navalny a suspended sentence and sent his brother to prison for three and a half years.
The European court’s rulings are legally binding for Russia.
Navalny said after the hearing that the Supreme Court’s surprise decision shows Russia’s refusal to respect its international obligations.
“There are no (fair) courts in Russia, and even the mere chance to influence that via a higher power has just got even slimmer,” Navalny said on his website. “This is big news and a step to a new low.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here