LABOUR’S Welsh Government was yesterday accused of “capitulating” to Theresa May over her demands on the transfer of devolved powers from Brussels after Brexit.
The criticism was made by the SNP’s Pete Wishart a day after an agreement was announced between Westminster and Cardiff over changes made to the controversial Clause 11 of the EU Withdrawal Bill.
READ MORE: The First Minister isn't isolated on Brexit deal – Scotland has her back
Speaking at Scotland Questions in the Commons, the Perthshire MP pressed Scottish Secretary David Mundell on the UK Government’s decision to take legal action over Holyrood’s alternative Brexit legislation, passed by MSPs last month.
Like Holyrood, the Welsh Assembly passed its own EU continuity bill, but it will now repeal this after reaching an agreement on amendments to the Westminster legislation.
Wishart asked: “Does the secretary of state think that taking the Scottish Parliament to court to overturn the democratic decision of that Parliament will help to strengthen the ties between Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom?”
READ MORE: Former coalition MSP tells Labour and LibDems to back FM over Brexit bill
After Mundell replied “No”, Wishart added: “For the first time ever, I probably agree with the secretary of state. It comes as no surprise to us that Welsh Labour has so easily capitulated to the Tories on this issue. We will never stop defending the integrity of our Parliament, and we will never allow the Tories to diminish our Parliament’s powers.”
He went on to ask whether the new amendments would mean the UK Government could overrule Holyrood if it did not give its consent to new legislation based on the repatriated powers.
Mundell did not directly answer the question, insisting the UK Government still wanted to secure the agreement of the Scottish Government on the Clause 11 amendments, adding that he hoped there would be further discussions between the two sides next week.
READ MORE: Scotland will realise why Labour is talking mince on federalism
Under the new proposal, the majority of 64 Welsh Assembly powers currently operated by the European Union in Brussels will transfer to Cardiff after Brexit.
The rest – 24 powers in all – will be held in Westminster for a period of up to seven years so that UK-wide systems can be created for matters such as animal welfare and food standards.
The deal includes a political agreement – not a legal one – that the UK Government will seek the Assembly’s consent before changing any of those powers held in London.
In Cardiff, Welsh Secretary Mark Drakeford insisted enough progress had been made to agree to the changes.
However, he added: “This outcome is not perfect. We would have preferred there to be no Clause 11 and for each of the governments to trust each other’s undertakings not to legislate in areas where we agree UK-wide frameworks are needed until such frameworks have been agreed.
“We have repeatedly been clear we were prepared to give such assurances and to accept similar assurances from the other governments.
“Others have sought stronger reassurance that no one part of the UK – including England – could develop its own legislation in relation to these areas where a UK-wide framework is needed until such a framework has been negotiated and agreed.”
He added: “Of course there are those who argue that it is unacceptable that – even in extreme circumstances – Parliament can act to impose constraints on devolved competence. But until a new constitutional settlement for the whole United Kingdom is negotiated – for which this government has long argued – it is the constitutional reality that Parliament is sovereign.”
The deal has been welcomed by the Welsh Conservatives, but Plaid Cymru accused Labour of selling Wales “down the river”. Plaid MP Liz Saville Roberts raised a point of order in the Commons yesterday asking for an oral statement on the agreement: “Despite the profound significance of this backroom deal it is being raised by the UK Government by written statement only,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel