FOR the past two years I have been involved in several cases raised by constituents who are trying to find out who owns land and property.
Cases range from a business trying to expand, residents trying to secure common repairs and constituents living in tenements with growing numbers of short-term lets. In such instances, folk want to find out easily, speedily and affordably who owns land or property that has a direct impact on their lives.
All too often, however, they can’t do so. One constituent was told it would cost her £150 to find out who owned five flats in her stair. She couldn’t afford it.
It is an odd state of affairs when it is harder to establish land ownership in 2018 than it was in 1915. The Finance Act of 1910 (Lloyd George’s famous “People’s Budget”) proposed an increment levy on the increase in value of land. To establish a baseline of values, surveyors mapped out, in intricate detail, the ownership, occupation, value and use of virtually all of the UK and Ireland, covering 99.7% of the land area of Scotland.
In 2018, with modern technology such as digital mapping, satellite imagery, online technology and smartphones, we have yet to come close to what the Edwardians achieved with paper maps and ink.
Across the world, modern technology and integrated data management has delivered land information systems that provide comprehensive data on land for citizens. For example, you can find out a wide range of information about land parcels anywhere in the US state of Montana right now for free on the internet. If you want the same data for Scotland, you will be frustrated at every turn, expend an inordinate amount of time, and you’ll have to pay for it.
The question of who owns Scotland has been around for decades. John McEwen had a go at answering it in 1979 and it was the focus of my first book, published in 1996. In the early years of devolution, I tried to persuade the then Scottish Executive to open up land information to the public but there was little appetite.
Since then, I have made representations to the Scottish Government and the Parliament during the course of the Land Registration (Scotland) Act 2012 to persuade them to increase transparency and, in particular, to provide free access to existing land information held by the Registers of Scotland. The proposal was firmly rejected by the then economy minister, Fergus Ewing.
In July, John Swinney announced proposals to develop a Scottish Land Information Service (SCOTLIS), an online portal that would enable “citizens, communities, professionals and business to access comprehensive information about any piece of land or property in Scotland”.
The service was developed by Registers of Scotland and launched in November 2017 (scotlis.ros.gov.uk). It is useless.
There is no map-search facility, there is no information beyond an index of titles and nothing on land values or planning. As always, any information you do find, you will have to pay for.
Then, on March 1, 2018, the Registers of Scotland published an overseas company report and a statistical report on the overseas ownership of land in Scotland. Against growing demands for greater transparency in who owns land and property across the world, this is presumably Scotland’s contribution.
The report reveals the companies registered overseas that own land in Scotland. But this is the tip of the iceberg because it only takes into account land in the modern register and not the older Sasines register. It doesn’t include any information on how much land is owned overseas (my own research shows that 750,000 acres of Scotland is owned in tax havens – posing problems for law enforcement and tax authorities).
And yet, the public are denied access to the data underlying the overseas company report because to obtain a copy will cost you an astonishing £1560. Even if you could afford this sum of money, you would need to pay another £30 per record for detailed information on each of the entries. If you wanted full ownership information for all 1700 companies, that comes to a cool £51,000.
The Scottish Government has asked the Registers of Scotland to complete the land register by 2024. This is ambitious but it fails to address the more fundamental question of what is available now and on what terms.
The public deserve access to information about who owns Scotland. It’s time to end the secrecy and the costs and open up all information – environmental, planning, valuation, tenure, ownership – in an accessible manner which is free and easy to use by the citizen.
Over the coming months, I invite those with an interest to join me in campaigning for greater transparency and openness in land information.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel