‘FOR me, independence is about autonomy, allowing Scotland to meet success and failure on its own merit and not point an embittered finger of blame at anyone else”. These aren’t the words of a dyed-in-the-wool independence supporter, but rather a very recent convert who is no longer able to “tolerate a Tory Government prepared to treat devolution with blatant contempt”.
You might recognise these welcome and salient words from the brilliant news yesterday that the former Daily Record editor Murray Foote will back independence the next time we are asked the question.
What makes this intervention significant is that Murray was the mastermind behind the Daily Record’s famous Vow that made a last-minute “case for staying together in the UK”. Historians may well debate just how big an impact this had in Yes falling short in 2014, but it’s undoubtable that it did play a role in carrying No over the finishing line.
The key line in that Vow which its signatories Cameron, Clegg and Miliband (and their successors) gave little regard to was “the Scottish Parliament is permanent”. Today, the entire Conservative Party are guilty of trying to weaken and undermine the Parliament that Scotland voted Yes to overwhelmingly in 1997, and Labour and the LibDems are sitting on their hands doing nothing.
Nicola Sturgeon says she will update the country on plans for an independence referendum in the autumn, when it’s likely the details of what will probably be a hard Brexit are revealed.
The Scottish Greens could not be clearer in our commitment to campaigning for an independent Scotland. We’ll continue to make the case that the current constitutional crisis, and the decision by the UK Government to abolish unilaterally the principle of devolved consent, greatly increases the urgency of giving the people of Scotland control of our own future.
That said, there is more than one pro-independence party in Scotland and we can’t rely solely on the SNP to provide a vision of Scotland’s future that will win a majority. Our own Jobs in the New Economy report argues that, by focusing on delivering low-carbon improvements across the energy, land-use and industrial sectors, we can create more than 200,000 new green jobs.
We already know that similarly sized small countries are successfully implementing progressive economic, social and environmental policies that Scotland could match, but only as a fully independent member of the international community and the EU.
The SNP’s Growth Commission has taken too many lessons from a right-of-centre economic agenda and does not offer the transformative alternative needed if we’re to inspire the people of Scotland to choose a better future.
New Zealand Green MP Gareth Hughes is right that Scotland should be looking to his country’s new forward-looking, progressive model, rather than the previous dead-end agenda the Growth Commission drew from.
Our reaction to the Growth Commission report begins with the long-standing Green critique of growth economics itself. Everlasting growth in a finite world and a fragile ecosystem under extreme pressure is neither achievable nor desirable. Even while it lasts, growth alone tells us nothing about how fairly wealth is being shared or how unfairly the social and environmental burdens fall.
Economic growth is placed at the heart of the SNP’s independence report, but earlier this week, at the launch of the National Performance Framework, the First Minister quoted Bobby Kennedy’s famous words that GDP “measures everything except what makes life worth living”. I hope this contradiction is an indication that the SNP already accept the limitations of this version of independence.
Where we already have broad agreement with our pro-independence counterparts at Holyrood is that leaving the EU and the single market will hugely damage our society and economy and will put at risk a vast range of critically important environmental protections, covering everything from clean air to food production. We’ve said this time and time again, individually as MSPs, as a party and with one voice, as a Scottish Parliament, but still Westminster refuses to listen.
Of course, the UK Government likes to pick and choose which referendum results to cite in defence of ignoring Scotland’s wishes. It often references the 52% across the UK who voted to leave the EU while ignoring the 62% in Scotland who voted overwhelmingly to remain.
Time and time again, we hear how Scotland voted against independence and that the matter is settled. I can assure readers of The National that it is not settled and, like Murray Foote, we’ll remind the Tories that 74% voted for a Scottish Parliament in 1997 and that they can’t treat it with “blatant contempt”.
Converting a former Daily Record editor is a major coup for the Yes movement, but he still only has one vote. Let’s now get out and persuade, in a friendly way, that Scotland’s future is best served free from the catastrophe that awaits us in Brexit Britain.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel