THE think tank Common Weal is to launch a campaign for a Scottish currency post-independence.
It has unveiled the move after criticising a recommendation made in the SNP’s Growth Commission report that the new state continue using the pound, though not in a formal currency union, until various economic tests have been met.
Writing in The National today, Common Weal director Robin McAlpine says the commission’s option would mean the newly independent country would not have control over how money is managed and would mean limits on fiscal policy, how tax was raised and public-services spending.
“Both Iceland and Greece have faced enormous financial and economic crises in recent times,” he says. “Iceland recovered quickly and its biggest problem is now that some parts of its economy are actually growing too fast. Greece is stuck in a downwards spiral.”
READ: 15-year wait for our own currency would leave us vulnerable like Greece
“So what is the difference between these two crises? Well the most fundamental difference was that tiny Iceland ... had its own currency and a central bank. It could use the full range of economic powers including monetary powers ... and fiscal powers ... to defend its economy.”
He says that Greece, by contrast, “had no control over its monetary policy and effectively no control over its fiscal policy. So instead of defending itself from the crisis it was forced to do exactly what foreign bankers told it to do.”
The currency issue is being debated again as the proposal in 2014 – to use the pound in a currency union with the UK – is seen as a weakness after Chancellor George Osborne rejected it.
The Growth Commission report underlined the precedent of Ireland, which continued to use the pound after it became independent, before adopting its own currency. Commission chair Andrew Wilson believes the report’s option is most likely to persuade those whose hearts said “Yes” but whose heads said “No” because of fears over currency and the economy.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel