A POT of cash to replace €1 billion of European funding, currently distributed by the Scottish Government, will be controlled by Westminster after Brexit, a Tory minister has signalled.
The bombshell announcement made by James Brokenshire, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government was last night attacked by third sector organisations and the SNP who say it is new evidence of a Tory power grab on Scotland.
The European Structural and Investment Funds are worth €1 billion to Scotland and help a wide range of projects including initiatives to address poverty, improve infrastructure and the environment and tackle pollution.
READ MORE: Lawyers from all three nations stand united against Westminster power grab
But Brokenshire told MPs the new UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), which will replace them will be run by the UK Government who will “engage” the devolved administrations.
“The UKSPF will operate across the UK. The government will of course respect the devolution settlements in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and will engage the devolved administrations to ensure the fund works for places across the UK,” he told MPs.
Alasdair Allan MSP, whose Na h-Eileanan an Iar constituency benefits significantly from European Structural Funding, said it was an example of “the billion-euro Tory power grab in action”.
He added: “European Structural Funding has helped to create employment, build roads and infrastructure and help tackle unemployment in every corner of Scotland – particularly in some of our most remote communities.
“To replace this with a system administered entirely by Westminster, instead of here in Scotland, would be completely unacceptable.
READ MORE: This is the most likely independence timetable
“Given their recent form in seeking to tear up the devolution settlement, there would be little reason to trust the Tories.”
Anna Fowlie, chief executive of the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO), has hit out.
She told Third Force News: “The SCVO has been consistent in our position that powers returning to the UK from the EU should be devolved so that Scotland’s needs can be considered and reflected in decision-making.
“The UK Parliament has promised engagement with devolved administrations on these matters before but their track record suggests they are more interested in England’s priorities and not at all concerned with those of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.”
Maggie Lennon, director of the Bridges Programmes in Glasgow which supports refugees and asylum seekers, said Scotland should be managing the new fund not simply consulted.”Scotland should not merely be consulted on this new fund – Scotland should be managing it,” she said. “Scotland will get a smaller share, is not a priority for Westminster, and jobs and services for some of our most vulnerable people and regions will be at risk.”
READ MORE: UK lawyer’s attempted gazump only highlights devolution truth
The ESIF scheme is currently handled by Scottish ministers. Money is allocated on a six year basis with the 2014 to 2020 funds for Scotland worth €476 million and €465m respectively. Projects to restore mountain paths, help vulnerable BME women and support children from low income families are among initiatives which have received funds.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel