TORY Trade Secretary Liam Fox faces ridicule after he warned that a no-deal Brexit was now more likely than the UK getting an agreement with Europe.
Little more than a year ago, Fox promised that a post-Brexit free trade deal with the EU should be the “easiest in human history” to achieve.
But, speaking to a Sunday newspaper, Theresa May’s International Trade Secretary now put the chances of a no-deal Brexit at “60/40”.
READ MORE: Sturgeon to canvas farmers for rural views on Brexit
Fox claimed the blame for the lack of a deal lay entirely with Brussels’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier.
“I think the intransigence of the European Commission is pushing us towards no deal,” he said. “We have set out the basis on which a deal can happen but if the EU decides that the obsession of the unelected is to take priority over the economic wellbeing of the people of Europe and it’s a bureaucrats’ Brexit, not a people’s Brexit – then there is only going to be one outcome.”
May met French president Emmanuel Macron on Friday to discuss her Chequers plan. It was reportedly an attempt to try to deal directly with one of the most powerful governments among the other 27 EU countries, rather than with Barnier.
Downing Street’s refusal to release details of what the two talked about and what was or was not agreed has fuelled speculation that May did not meet her objective.
READ MORE: Banks told to stockpile cash and prepare for a recession in case of a hard Brexit
That, in turn, has fuelled speculation that the UK’s talks with the EU could be heading for collapse.
Fox claimed Barnier had dismissed Britain’s proposals “because we have never done it before” and argued that “makes the chance of no deal greater”.
He said if the EU didn’t like the UK’s proposals then it should provide answers of its own. “If they don’t like the one [deal] we have put on the table then it’s down to them to show us one that they can suggest that would be acceptable to us,” Barnier said. “It’s up to the EU27 to determine whether they want the EU Commission’s ideological purity to be maintained at the expense of their real economies.”
An exasperated Scottish Brexit Secretary Michael Russell tweeted a link to the newspaper story, saying: “It is deeply worrying that [Fox] understands so little about the #EU”.
In July 2017, Fox told Radio 4’s Today programme: “The free trade agreement that we will have to do with the European Union should be one of the easiest in human history.
“We are already beginning with zero tariffs, and we are already beginning at the point of maximal regulatory equivalence, as it is called. In other words, our rules and our laws are exactly the same.”
The only thing that made securing that deal tricky would be “because politics gets in the way of economics”, Fox added.
READ MORE: Letters: The rich won't suffer under Brexit Britain rationing
Asked in October if he regretted those comments, he replied: “No, I don’t.”
Remain-supporting peer Andrew Adonis tweeted: “If Liam Fox’s trade deals were ‘the easiest in history,’ how come he now thinks we are probably leaving with no deal? Might he just possibly have been telling another Brexit lie?”
Fox’s comments came just days after both Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt and Bank of England governor Mark Carney warned a no-deal Brexit was possible.
The SNP’s Foreign Affairs spokesman, Stephen Gethins, ridiculed Fox’s comments and called on the Government to remain in the single market and customs union: “First it was Mark Carney, then Jeremy Hunt and now Liam Fox is saying we are likely facing a no-deal scenario when the UK leaves the EU.
“Theresa May must heed the warnings on what that would mean for the UK economy, jobs and livelihoods.”
Labour’s Keir Starmer tweeted: “No deal would be a catastrophic failure of government, which no government should survive. The cause: PM’s reckless red lines, Tory divisions & fantasy Brexiteer promises. Parliament has a duty to prevent it.”
No 10 insisted May remained confident that she can get a good deal from Europe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel