A BACK-to-school campaign has been launched – to help parents take primary one pupils out of national testing.
The postcard push by education campaigners Upstart Scotland began yesterday as term started in areas including Fife, Renfrewshire and Glasgow .
The Scottish Government says parents and guardians do not have the "formal legal right" to withdraw youngsters from assessments and should talk to teachers about concerns.
READ MORE: The lessons Gaelic schools can teach us about learning
But Upstart, which has the backing of teaching union EIS and parents organisation Connect, disputes this.
Founder Sue Palmer, a former primary headteacher, said: "Parents are entitled to opt their children out but the government has not publicised the fact – in fact, they seem to have gone out of their way to conceal it.
"Many parents will want to withdraw their children from the tests because they’re worried it will distress them. But we hope parents will also opt out to show they believe that ‘Play Not Tests for P1’ is in the interests of all Scottish children, now and in the future."
Postcards will be available from Upstart Scotland and the organisations endorsing the campaign, including EIS, Connect, Play Scotland, Children in Scotland and ACE-Aware Nation.
Organisers hope parents will hand them in to schools to remove their children from national standardised assessments.
The measure replaces a patchwork of local tests and is aimed at monitoring literacy and numeracy.
However, EIS says some children have been distressed by the process since it was introduced last year and all Holyrood opposition parties have called on the SNP administration to scrap it for the youngest pupils.
In one fractious session of First Minister's Questions before the summer recess, Labour leader Richard Leonard challenged Nicola Sturgeon to answer posers set for primary ones, asking her to give an alternative name for a hummingbird's beak.
However, the Scottish Government said this was given in a multiple choice format, with the correct answer "bill" presented along with other options "skin" and "body".
Yesterday former Children's Commissioner Tam Baillie, now an Upstart Scotland trustee, said: "International evidence shows that the under-sevens need a play-based approach to learning with plenty of opportunities for active, outdoor, social, self-directed play. "This is even more important now children have so few opportunities for outdoor play during their out-of-school hours. Testing P1 on the 3Rs pulls Scottish education in exactly the opposite direction."
Meanwhile, EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan said: "The EIS is sceptical about the worth of standardised assessments generally but we're particularly opposed to their introduction for P1 pupils.
"They bring a rigid formality to assessment at a stage where the judgements of teachers, based on observation of child-centred learning, are all that's needed to identify and address the developmental needs of the infants."
However, a spokesperson for the Scottish Government countered: "The assessments are part of everyday learning and teaching.
"As has been the case for decades, for almost all teaching and learning there is no formal legal right for parents to withdraw their child from individual elements of that teaching and learning.
"However, as the Scottish government has always maintained, if a parent did not wish their child to take part in an aspect of teaching and learning, they should discuss this with the school, who have discretion available to them to decide whether the child then takes part in any given activity."
READ MORE: Swinney: I’m listening on tests for five-year-olds
The postcard campaign is backed by a two minute animation posted on social media setting out the reasoning behind the Play Not Tests campaign.
Palmer, who advocates the introduction of a Finnish-style kindergarten stage between nursery and formal education, said: "Due to Scotland’s extraordinarily early school starting age, our P1s will be sitting tests at an age when the overwhelming majority of European children aren’t even at school."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel