THE BBC has apologised on air for an error in its reporting of the latest GERS figures, which an SNP MSP had branded "disgraceful" and "fake news".
In its report on the release of the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) statistics, the BBC made a mess of its presentation of spending figures.
Today, the broadcaster interrupted its 1pm TV news bulletin to say it had confused the spending of the Scottish Government with that of the public sector as a whole.
READ MORE: SNP aren’t helping with the BBC’s problem of properly representing Scotland
The presenter said: "Scotland's public finances have improved slightly, with an increase in revenue and a reduction in the deficit, according to the latest figures.
"But the Scottish Government last year spent nearly £13.5 billion more than it raised, meaning the nation's deficit is four times higher than that of the UK as a whole."
While the deficit may be £13.5bn, the BBC presented it as the "Scottish Government" being responsible for all of that expenditure – when in fact, it also accounts for UK Government spending in Scotland.
SNP MSP Paul Wheelhouse hit back yesterday, saying: "This is disgraceful @BBCNews – your presenter clearly states that GERS says 'the Scottish Government last year spent nearly £13.5bn more than it raised'.
"This is a really serious factual error & I expect to see an equally prominent/high profile apology to [finance secretary] @DerekMackaySNP!
"The deficit figures are after UK Govt spend on pensions, welfare and cost of UK national debt service, Trident nukes (not wanted here) et al are added in!
"I am often frustrated by ignorant coverage but have often shrugged it off – this goes into seriously fake news territory & given how important this issue is, this sort of disgraceful misrepresentation is totally unacceptable from a very well resourced public service broadcaster."
📺 @BBCNews has apologised for how it covered #GERS yesterday. They reported @ScotGov spent £13.5 billion more than it raised. This is incorrect as that figure covers *all* public sector expenditure in Scotland, including areas controlled by @number10gov and other public bodies. pic.twitter.com/dcR8fgKDYv
— Ross Colquhoun (@rosscolquhoun) August 23, 2018
Now, the BBC have apologised on air for the inaccuracy.
A presenter explained: "Yesterday on the BBC News at One we reported on an improvement in Scotland's public finances with an increase in revenue and a reduction in the deficit.
"In doing so we said that the Scottish Government last year spent nearly £13.5bn more than it raised.
"That was incorrect. That figure covers all public sector expenditure in Scotland, including areas controlled by the UK Government and other public bodies.
"We apologise for that mistake on yesterday's programme."
Wheelhouse welcomed the broadcaster's apology.
He tweeted: "Fair play to @BBCNews for correcting yesterday’s mistake & doing so in a way that’s equally likely to have been seen by the same audience.
"I appreciate that move – a classy approach & thank the team also for writing to me privately to explain how they have addressed my concerns."
Yesterday's GERS figures revealed that Scotland was in a better place than it was last year, with the notional deficit – the difference between what is spent and raised – from 8.9% to 7.9% of GDP.
They also showed a large rise in Scottish North Sea revenue, rising from £266 million in 2016/17 to £1.327bn in 2017/18.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel