EDUCTATION Secretary John Swinney has apologised to parliament for a "misleading" letter on controversial primary school tests sent by a senior civil servant.
Swinney said that while he did not personally sign off on the missive from Graeme Logan, a deputy director at the Scottish Government, he took full responsibility for it.
READ MORE: Campaign launched to take P1 pupils out of national testing
Swinney told MSPs at Holyrood he remained committed to the Scottish national standardised assessments at all levels despite cross-party opposition and calls to "cut his losses" on the issue.
Ministers had been pressed to clarify whether parents had the right to pull their child out of the tests after concerns about the P1 assessments.
READ MORE: John Swinney announces changes to P1 testing
The letter from Logan to councils last week said children could only be withdrawn in "exceptional circumstances" and stated that advice had been taken from the Society of Local Authority Lawyers in Scotland (Solar) – which was later disputed by the organisation.
Conservative MSP Liz Smith asked whether Swinney had personally signed off the letter, which she said had contained "misleading" information.
He responded: "I did not sign off the letter that was issued by the deputy director to directors of education but I take full responsibility for it because I'm a minister in the Scottish Government and it's right that I take full responsibility for it.
"We did not seek legal advice from Solar. We discussed the legal position that we hold to, which has been consistent throughout all of the government's communication on this matter, we discussed that with representatives of the Solar organisation but ... an error was made in our handling of this in that we expressed a view which we believed to have been expressed by Solar, but which in fact Solar does not express such opinions.
"I can only apologise to Parliament ... for the events that took place in that respect, but I take responsibility for it because I should take responsibility for it."
He stressed that the substance of the letter was consistent with the Scottish Government's position – that while there is no statutory right for parents to withdraw their child from any aspect of schooling other than some parts of religious education, they could discuss the matter with the school.
Swinney, who has already announced changes to the P1 tests in response to concerns, said he remained committed to them as they provided valuable information for teachers.
"I want that information to be available so that at the earliest opportunity we can act to close the attainment gap," he said.
Green MSP Ross Greer urged Swinney to "cut his losses".
"In the case of P1 tests it's quite clear that a majority of this parliament want to see them go and sooner or later that is what we're going to vote for," he said.
Labour's Iain Gray said: "Faced with the evidence of stress on four and five-year-olds caused by these tests, testimony from teachers that they are time-consuming and of little educational worth, and a campaign by parents to boycott them, he is carrying on regardless.
"In P1, at least, they should be suspended. I believe that's the view of this parliament and I hope we will have the chance to demonstrate that as soon as possible."
Lib Dem Tavish Scott urged Swinney to "reflect on the fact that he hasn't carried the case in terms of four and five-year-old girls and boys".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel