AS further evidence emerges of the damage that Brexit will do to Scotland’s country areas, Fergus Ewing, the Cabinet Secretary for the Rural Economy, has exclusively told The National of the “huge risks” that Brexit could bring throughout rural Scotland.
In the past few days, reports have emerged of Brexit’s likely damage to rural Scotland at either end of the country.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon hits out at appointment of Tory minister for food supplies
At the Holyrood Economy Committee, in response to a question by Labour MSP Jackie Baillie, the chief executive of Highland and Islands Enterprise, Charlotte Wright, said Brexit was the “biggest challenge” facing the area.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn meets EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier for 'useful discussion'
She said: “If you’re asking me what I see as the biggest challenge for the Highlands and Islands, it is without a shadow of a doubt the people equation.
“We already have significant challenges, across all sectors, in all parts of the Highlands and Islands, not really of skills but actually of people.”
Wright said half of the 1000 businesses on their panels were concerned about Brexit and fears were even higher “in sectors such as tourism and food and drink, which are very heavily reliant on migrant workers.”
Meanwhile Scottish Borders Council – in considering whether to promote the creation of a single public sector authority for the area – was told that Brexit could have a greater impact on the Borders than elsewhere.
A report to councillors stated: “The degree of reliance on agriculture and fishing, and the local economy’s dependence on tradable sectors within the region’s small towns is predicted to increase the Scottish Borders’ exposure to any negative consequences of Brexit.”
Ewing commented: “It is clear that Brexit poses huge risks for businesses, farmers and communities throughout rural Scotland.
“The UK Government’s approach to Brexit, and migration in particular, is harmful to Scotland’s interests.
“Their proposals completely ignore the workforce requirements of key sectors of our rural economy – such as tourism, agriculture and forestry. For example, our soft fruit and vegetable sectors alone requires up to 22,000 non-UK seasonal migrant workers.
“It is deeply concerning the UK Government are pursuing a migration scheme that would freeze out an estimated 75% of roles taken up by EU citizens in Scotland.
“We are calling for more a flexible approach to migration with more powers for Scottish Ministers and the Scottish Parliament – something backed by a clear majority of Scottish opinion – to develop solutions that meet our needs.
“Increased trade barriers and customs delays could seriously harm the entire supply chain for our food and drink industry. That is why we have been clear that remaining in the Single Market and Customs Union, which is around eight times bigger than the UK market alone, is the best way to safeguard Scotland’s interests.
Ewing added the UK Government’s Agriculture Bill “rides roughshod over the devolved settlement and fails to deliver on their promise that Scottish farmers would continue to receive at least the same level of funding as they currently do after Brexit.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel