AS another summer comes to a close, I have increasingly been made aware of the mixed views of some of my constituents in Sighthill-Gorgie towards the Edinburgh Festival.
Whilst many enjoy the range of events on offer, a growing number are concerned about the impact on the city’s services, citing overcrowded buses, blocked and over-trafficked streets and mushrooming AirBnB holiday lets.
There is also a sense of concern that the city’s limited cultural resources are concentrated on high-profile city centre events in August at the expense of cultural activities in our communities the rest of the year round.
Earlier this year, I asked Edinburgh Council to investigate the distribution of public budgets by locality. I became aware that not all budgets are proportionately allocated across the city and feel that we have a duty to ensure that resources are fairly and equitably distributed.
For instance, in terms of culture, I was dismayed to discover that there has been a very heavy bias towards funding large institutions headquartered in the city centre at the expense of organisations working within our communities.
A massive 73% of the capital’s cultural revenue funding currently goes to organisations based in the south-east locality, of which 61% goes to organisations based in the City Centre ward alone.
What is worse is that these allocations have been rolled over, without competition, for a number of years. Following discussion at the Culture and Communities Committee last November, we agreed to review the process for allocating cultural grants.
I am pleased to say that a new application process will be implemented for 2019. This refresh is long overdue as rolling over funding allocations lacks transparency and stifles the ability of new arts organisations to flourish.
We also need to address geographical exclusion. No organisation in my ward has received cultural revenue funding in recent years.
Even more worrying is that no organisation in the whole South West locality has received any such funding, showing just how geographically imbalanced these allocations are.
Whilst we are fortunate to host international arts events in our city, I believe that the pendulum has swung too far towards funding large, centrally headquartered bodies at the expense of local community groups.
I was alerted to this imbalance by research conducted by Gorgie Collective, a community arts group in my ward. As the chair of Gorgie Collective, Katriona Gillespie, explains: “There has been a historic imbalance in the way cultural resources have been allocated in Edinburgh. We were shocked when our research showed such a heavy bias towards city centre organisations.
“We believe the Council has a responsibility to provide equality of access to cultural resources to communities across the whole city.”
It is entirely unsurprising that this lack of resources results in cultural disengagement. The most recent Edinburgh People Survey makes for depressing reading, as my ward, Sighthill-Gorgie, is the most culturally disengaged area in the city.
Young professionals in my area state that they feel that cultural resources have become even more city-centric in recent years. The benefits to wellbeing that culture and the arts can bring are well known.
I am glad to say that work is now under way to address this inequitable distribution. Following my motion in May, Edinburgh Council has recently published a report profiling spend across each locality. A further report, identifying opportunities to devolve certain budgets to local level, will come before the council in October.
Ashley Graczyk is an independent councillor for the Sighthill-Gorgie ward.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here