AT first it seemed like a sick joke being perpetrated by the mischievous rightwing blogger Guido Fawkes, but now there really is a serious campaign to put the face of Margaret Thatcher on the new Bank of England £50 note.
The idea has received the blessing of the patron saint of current Thatcherites, Old Etonian MP Jacob Rees-Mogg who tweeted following a fawning story – what else was likely? – in The Telegraph promoting the notion.
Rees-Mogg tweeted: “Putting Lady Thatcher’s picture on the £50 note would be a timely reminder of how to negotiate with the EU.”
READ MORE: The National's 10 picks for the face of the new £50 note
Several replies reminded him that his heroine believed in the single market and customs union – in fact she was one of its chief promoters.
The originator of the campaign is Old Harrovian Paul Delaire Staines who writes as Guido Fawkes.
His petition read: “The Bank of England are redesigning the £50 following the successful redesign of the £5, £10, and £20 notes. Just one of these notes so far has featured a woman other than the Queen, and in the interests of gender equality, who would be more appropriate to feature than the first female Prime Minister of the United Kingdom?”
Not surprisingly, the notion of the late Baroness being honoured in similar fashion to Winston Churchill – he is on the Bank of England fiver – is meeting with incredulity in Scotland.
Clare Adamson, SNP MSP for Motherwell and Wishaw which suffered industrial devastation under Thatcher, said: “This suggestion couldn’t be further out of step with public opinion in Scotland.
“In fact, to many it will be downright insulting. Margaret Thatcher’s toxic policies and erosion of Scottish industry left many communities deeply divided. It has taken decades, in some cases, for those wounds to heal.
“The harsh lessons of Thatcherism remain more prescient than ever – as Tory austerity continues to drive people into poverty, and the UK Government threatens to crash our economy amid the chaos of Brexit. All of this, despite having no mandate in Scotland.”
Scottish Labour MP Hugh Gaffney said: “Those of us in the Scottish trade union movement who suffered first-hand from Thatcherism in the 80s will be rightly outraged by this. This disgusting idea should be kicked into touch.”
The Scottish Greens told us: “Anyone asking for change from a £50 note will see their chances reduced even further if this daft proposal goes ahead.”
One Scottish political party unsurprisingly did support the idea.
A spokesman for the Scottish Conservatives said: “Surely remembering the UK’s first female prime minister in this way is well worth doing, and we look forward to The National offering its full support to the campaign.”
Good luck with that.
The National can reveal that the whole campaign may fall at the first hurdle. For while the Bank of England is officially not commenting on the Thatcher issue, sources at the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street confirmed that the same process will be followed for the new polymer £50 note as was used for the £20 note two years ago.
The Bank chooses a theme for which a suitable person could be nominated – in the case of the £20 note it was visual arts, and that’s why JMW Turner will replace Adam Smith on the notes from 2020 onwards. A theme for the £50 note will be announced soon, after which the public will be asked to nominate suitable people to represent that theme. Recent political history with all its divisiveness is unlikely to be chosen, for as the bank says on its website “banknotes need to be universally accepted”.
We could also point out that if an English person is chosen for the £50 note of the UK’s central bank, then two Scots will have been removed, namely Adam Smith of the current £20 and James Watt of the £50. You have been warned, Bank of ENGLAND.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here