NICOLA Sturgeon has reacted with fury after UK Government ministers demanded she cancel constituency commitments to meet with Theresa May’s de facto deputy.
Cabinet office minister David Lidington, who is is Scotland today, says his department tried to arrange talks with Sturgeon, but were knocked back.
READ MORE: Here's why The National wasn't given a chance to scrutinise May's deputy
The First Minister took to Twitter to hit out at the Tory minister.
“This is outrageous,” she said. “My office got a call around 6pm last night to offer a meeting this morning - purpose not clear. I wasn’t prepared to cancel my constituency commitments at such short notice for @scotgov to yet again have to hear empty platitudes rather than be listened to.”
During his trip north of the Border, Lidington, who is tipped to replace Dominic Raab as Brexit Secretary, used an interview with local radio to tell his colleagues calling for a leadership contest that they would be defeated. May, he said, would win a no confidence vote "handsomely".
Bauer Radio Scotland asked what he would say to MPs submitting letters of no confidence to the 1922 committee of Tory backbenchers.
He said: "Withdraw them, because I don't think you're doing the country any good by attacking the Prime Minister in this way.
"I've seen no plausible alternative plan from any of those criticising her or wanting to challenge her position.
"I believe if it does comes to a challenge the Prime Minister will win handsomely and she will deserve to do so."
Under Tory party rules, a leadership contest is held when 48 backbench MPs submit letters to Graham Brady who chairs the 1922 committee.
At least four more letters have been handed over to Brady.
Maria Caulfield, Adam Holloway, John Whittingdale and Mark Francois have all said they could no longer support the prime minister.
In a statement, Whittingdale said: “I want the government to pursue a proper free trade agreement which does deliver the Brexit objectives but which keeps us as close to Europe as possible.
“I believe that is on offer from the European Union but it is clear that the prime minister is unwilling to move from her existing position. Therefore I felt there is no alternative but to seek a vote of confidence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel