‘CRUDE” measurements have failed to reveal the scale of childhood obesity in Scotland as it grows to affect more than 100,000 youngsters, researchers claim.
Strathclyde University experts say reliance on body mass index (BMI) is masking the true scale of the public health problem affecting young people.
They now warn “large numbers” of “apparently healthy” children and teenagers have “excessively high” levels of body fat when assessed through other measures.
The BMI ratio is based on height and weight, but the team says alternative calculations are “far more accurate” in assessing the nation’s waistline.
Leading a study of obesity in Africa, which involved 1500 primary schoolchildren across eight separate countries, Professor John Reilly of Strathclyde’s School of Psychological Sciences and Health found 9% could be defined as obese by BMI (9%), but this increased to 29% using the deuterium dilution method, which measures excessive weight by total body water.
He is now calling for that measure to bump BMI from health charts.
Reilly said: “BMI is a straightforward and cost-effective way of measuring obesity in children. It has become widely-used in national surveys and in public health information but it is a very crude proxy measure.
“Large numbers of children and adolescents with an apparently healthy BMI for their age have an excessively high body fat content. Childhood obesity is at least twice as prevalent as reported in national surveys and official publications.
“In fact, more than 100,000 Scottish children and young people will have obesity at present.”
He went on: “The deuterium dilution measure would be more costly and would take longer than BMI – three to four hours compared with 15 to 20 minutes for BMI – but it would present us with a far more accurate picture of the scale of the problem.
“It needs to be properly studied and could be worth the consideration and investment.”
The Strathclyde team was involved in the biennial Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance (AHKGA) report, which assesses global trends in childhood physical activity in almost 50 countries and provides “report cards” on the physical activity and health of children.
Exercise levels here were far below the recommended rates, while screen time was amongst the worst in the world.
Scotland’s D+ rating placed it in the lower half of the rankings, compared to England’s C.
Reilly said: “There is no longer any room for complacency about childhood obesity anywhere in the world; urgent measures will be required to prevent and control the problem.”
Dr Mark Tremblay, AHKGA president, said: “We all have a collective responsibility to address these cultural and social norms – particularly screen time – because inactive children are at risk for adverse physical, mental, social and cognitive health problems.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel