HOLYROOD has voted to reject Theresa May's proposed Brexit deal and a no-deal Brexit by 93 votes to 27.
The draft withdrawal agreement fails to "provide a solution to the current chaos of Brexit", Scottish Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell told MSPs.
A "unique collaboration" by the SNP, Labour, the Greens and the LibDems resulted in a joint motion condemning both May's deal and the prospect of a no-deal Brexit.
With the motion passing, "Scotland will say that it rejects both the Prime Minister's deal and no deal, and instead looks to its politicians to find a better way forward," Russell said before the vote.
He reiterated the Scottish Government's support for the UK as a whole staying in the single market and customs union – but also pointed out SNP MPs would back either a second referendum on Brexit or an early general election.
Russell said: "The only option that does not provide a solution to the current chaos of Brexit is that proposed by the Prime Minister."
The current deal would see parts of Scotland "severely and permanently damaged" by a reduction in EU migrants, Russell added.
READ MORE: The story of how six Scottish politicians took on the UK and the EU
He went on to warn it would make it "considerably harder" for legal and financial sector firms, many of whom are based in Edinburgh, to deal with Europe.
"Why would a party led by Ruth Davidson vote in favour of that?" he asked.
Russell continued: "In every area of Scotland there are businesses, organisations, communities and individuals who will suffer, directly suffer, over a long period of time if this deal is approved.
"Each and every person will suffer. The analysis we have done indicates that by 2030, if after leaving the EU we move to a free trade agreement, GDP will be cut by £9 billion – equivalent to £1,600 per person in Scotland.
"So forget £350 million a week more for the NHS – the reality is £30 a week less for every man, woman and child with no respite."
Russell continued: "This deal is not even the end of uncertainty. That is just another false promise.
"In fact the uncertainty flowing from the Prime Minister's deal would last until the end of the transition period, which will not be in December 2020, no-one believes that, more likely December 2022 or even later.
"That's at least four years of uncertainty to add to the two-and-a-half we've already had.
"Four more years of stagnation and lack of investment, with no guarantee that a free trade deal will ever be struck. Those are the fruits of Conservative government. More of the same and worse.
"More meaningless assertions, false claims, cliff-edge negotiations and economic lack of confidence and security. It mustn't happen. Scotland needs and deserves better than the Prime Minister's blindfold Brexit.
"For in truth this deal is about saving the Prime Minister, not about saving her country."
WATCH: Ian Blackford just played the rules perfectly at PMQs
Conservative MSP Adam Tomkins said the Prime Minister's deal is the only credible proposal to have been tabled since the EU referendum.
He said: "Either we leave the EU on the basis of the orderly Withdrawal Agreement that the Prime Minister and her team have negotiated, or something very close to it, or we crash out of the EU on a no-deal basis that would be a disaster for the economy."
He said the motion put forward by the other parties to oppose the withdrawal plans and a no-deal Brexit is "just noise" and rejecting the Withdrawal Agreement makes a no-deal Brexit more likely.
"We want a better alternative, says the motion, without any clue as to what that alternative would be and how could possibly be delivered," he said.
He accused the SNP of trying to "weaponise" Brexit in the service of independence and said Labour and the LibDems have been "hoodwinked" into giving their support, before calling on MSPs to reject the motion and back the Prime Minister's deal.
He stressed Brexit is happening because the British people voted to leave, adding: "If it turns out that we the Scottish Conservatives are alone in standing up for the one million Scots who voted for that outcome, so be it."
Labour's Neil Findlay said the Prime Minister's deal is "doomed" and called for a general election.
He said the overwhelming feeling is "uncertainty" and accused the Conservatives of bringing in "utter chaos" through the EU referendum.
He said: "The Prime Minister's days are numbered.
"For the sake of the country, our economy, our jobs, our children, our environment and the rights we enjoy the Prime Minister should admit the game is up and let democracy prevail in a general election."
Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer said that by voting to reject the Brexit deal, the Scottish Parliament will "say clearly on behalf of the people of Scotland that there is a better way".
"This is a crisis of the Tory Party which they have turned into a profound national crisis," he said.
"It's a bad deal for Scotland democratically, economically, environmentally, culturally and so much more.
"For all of this – the loss of free movement, the loss of single market membership, the loss of protections for labour and environment standards – we are going to pay almost £40 billion.
"Even the Tory negotiators must concede that paying to lose out on rights, on privileges and on advantages; paying to be poorer, is a ridiculous place to be."
Greer, who was one of those who brought the case to the European Court of Justice about whether, and how, Article 50 could be revoked, welcomed the Advocate General's advice that the UK could unilaterally abandon Brexit.
He added: "The Greens hope that the final say on this deal can be put back in the hands of the people and that the deal be put on the ballot paper up against the option of revoking Article 50 and clearly saying that the benefits of staying in the EU are available to us."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel