NICOLA Sturgeon has heaped pressure on Jeremy Corbyn urging the Labour leader to call for a vote of no confidence in the Tory Government.
Speaking yesterday morning, the First Minister said that while an SNP MP could raise the motion in the Commons, Parliamentary rules meant it was only guaranteed to go to a vote if called by Labour.
Corbyn has repeatedly ruled out the move saying he wants to wait until he can be sure of winning.
But Labour’s leadership are reportedly split. Shadow Brexit Secretary Keir Starmer and deputy leader Tom Watson are said to be urging Corbyn to table a no-confidence vote this week.
READ MORE: What needs to happen for the UK to have a new vote on Brexit?
Speaking on the Sophy Ridge programme on Sky News, Sturgeon said: “We think Labour should table a confidence motion and I said last week if it does so, then the SNP will support that.
“I think it is possible that a confidence motion right now could succeed.
“This is a government that is weak and unstable and is becoming more weak and unstable with every day that passes.”
Sturgeon said that even if the House of Commons motion was not successful, it would at least help clarify Corbyn’s position.
She said: “Labour’s position is that it won’t back a second EU referendum unless it has tried and failed to trigger a General Election. But if it won’t try to trigger a General Election we are in this catch-22 position and it seems to me that Labour is as much a barrier to making progress on Brexit as the Tories are.”
READ MORE: Downing Street deny existence of secret plot for a second Brexit referendum
Yesterday, during a trip to Edinburgh, Corbyn was asked by Channel 4 News when he was going to make his move.
He replied: “Thanks very much for your question, you’ll hear the news when I announce it.”
Earlier in the day, Labour’s Shadow Communities Secretary Andrew Gwynne told the BBC’s Marr programme that Parliament “cannot move to the next stage until Parliament has decided whether or not to back the Prime Minister’s deal”.
Asked to clarify whether that meant Labour would not table a no-confidence motion until after a vote on the Brexit deal, he said it was “the next logical step”.
“We want to make sure that Parliament has its say on what is a catastrophically bad deal for this country. We can then move on beyond that.”
Labour’s Shadow Business Secretary Rebecca Long Bailey told Sky News a no-confidence vote would be a waste of Commons time.
“There are various different domestic policies and matters that need to be dealt with urgently and we don’t want to take up Parliamentary time unnecessarily,” she argued.
Meanwhile, Sturgeon, during her appearance on Sophy Ridge, also said she would update MSPs on indyref2 in the the New Year.
“I’ll set out my views in the New Year once we’ve got through this period of turmoil on Brexit,” she said.
Liam Fox, the International Trade Secretary, later appearing on Marr said it would be difficult to grant a second Brexit referendum and then not have a second referendum on independence.
“How can we tell Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP that they can’t have another independence referendum because they didn’t like the result?” he warned.
He added that “if there is a referendum... people like me will immediately start asking that it’s best of three”.
The comments came as a Panelbase poll for The Sunday Times suggested most Scottish voters believe it is only a matter of time before Scotland votes for independence.
Exactly half of voters expect Scottish independence to become a reality within the next 15 years.
A third of voters anticipate it happening in the next five to 10 years. Just 30% believe Scotland is unlikely to become independent “at any point in the next few decades”.
On the question of timing, 19% want another independence referendum while the UK is negotiating to leave the EU and 29% want one when the UK has finished negotiating to leave. 52% believe it should not be held “in the next few years”.
SNP depute leader Keith Brown told the Sunday Times: “Westminster incompetence is making the case for independence stronger by the day, and there is a democratic mandate for a referendum.
But the immediate priority is avoiding the disaster of a hard Brexit or a no-deal outcome.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel