THERESA May has been accused of trying to buy off her critics after one of the country’s most prominent Brexiteers was given a knighthood in the Queen’s New Year Honours list.
John Redwood, who claims the economic consequences of crashing out of the EU without a deal will be “wholly favourable” to the UK, is to become Sir John.
And, there was surprise too when late on Friday afternoon, Downing Street announced that Sir Edward Leigh was to become a member of the Privy Council.
Leigh, who has called for “no surrender, no appeasement” on the question of the Irish border, can now style himself right honourable, rather than just honourable, and will join a select group of senior politicians.
Other politicians to receive knighthoods include Remain supporting Tory MP Gary Streeter and Labour’s deputy chief whip Alan Campbell.
In an apparent bid to reassure supporters that he will not be swayed by his gong, Redwood published a blog on Thursday outlining “Eight things wrong with the Withdrawal Agreement”.
“This is an unbelievably bad Agreement for the UK and a great one for the EU,” he wrote.
“It is not a deal, as it does not offer the UK any of the things the PM said she wanted. It is an invitation to much more uncertainty and more talks on worse terms for the UK.”
Just three weeks ago, Redwood, one of the staunchest eurosceptics on the Tory benches, voted against May in the party’s no confidence ballot.
Redwood was criticised last year after he recommended foreign investors avoid Britain and “look further afield” because of the state of the UK economy.
Leigh, meanwhile, rode to the Prime Minister’s rescue during her recent leadership challenge.
In the House of Commons, he said he had an “unfashionably supportive view of the prime minister” and suggested he could be “persuaded” to support her deal.
SNP MP Brendan O’Hara commented on the list announcement, saying: “Theresa May’s blatant abuse of the honours system is clear, as she continues offering grubby inducements to MPs in an attempt to persuade them to vote for her faltering deal. These dubious honours just go to show how out of touch Westminster is with the concerns of the people of Scotland.
“The Prime Minister’s time would be much better spent listening to the growing opposition to her bad Brexit deal rather than dishing out honours to her Tory colleagues with the sole purpose of getting her deal over the line.
“It’s hard to imagine how the Prime Minister could make an already discredited honours system even more disreputable – yet somehow she’s managed it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel