SCOTTISH Labour has called for an independent review to consider issuing pardons to workers convicted of offences relating to the miners’ strike in the mid-1980s.
An inquiry was announced last year by former justice secretary Michael Matheson, who told MSPs the Scottish Government would “do what it can to do right by those affected by the dispute”.
An estimated 500 arrests were made in Scotland during the strike action, with scores of workers made redundant after being convicted.
Labour front bencher Neil Findlay said Scottish miners were arrested and dismissed at a disproportionate rate, with 30% of the sackings after arrest in Britain occurring north of the Border, despite just 10% of the then-mining workforce coming from Scotland.
“Mining communities across Britain suffered at the hands of politicised and often brutal policing as Margaret Thatcher and her Tory government used the power of the state to crush working people,” said the party’s business and campaigns manager.
“Scottish miners suffered disproportionately from these underhand tactics during this struggle. Many of these workers lost not just their jobs and income, but their relationships, their homes, and many their mental and physical health.
“Some were blacklisted and others went to their graves the victims of a miscarriage of justice with a criminal conviction against their name when the reality was they had done nothing wrong.”
He added: “The review of these convictions should consider pardons, and ensure that politicised convictions are thrown into the dustbin of history where they belong.”
The miners’ strike, which lasted from 1984 to 1985, took place after Margaret Thatcher announced plans to close a number of pits which were deemed “inefficient” by her government. In Scotland, the flashpoints included picket lines at the former Ravenscraig steel works in Lanarkshire, and Bilston Glen pit south of Edinburgh.
In 2016, former home secretary Amber Rudd ruled out holding an inquiry into the so-called Battle of Orgreave, when thousands of miners and police were involved in violent clashes at a coking plant in South Yorkshire.
It followed claims of an alleged cover-up after it emerged senior officers involved in the Hillsborough disaster five years later were also involved in the aftermath of Orgreave.
Announcing the review, Matheson said doing nothing was not an option and urged Sajid Javid, Rudd’s successor, to follow suit. He added: “Through this independent review, Scotland will certainly lead the way in ensuring that the experiences of those affected by the dispute in the 80s are properly recognised. Some of our communities have been blighted by the shadow of that time for too long.”
Documents released in 2017 showed the Thatcher administration believed an inquiry into the policing of the strike would become a “witch hunt”. According to the minutes of a 1985 meeting, home secretary Leon Brittan wanted to avoid “any form of inquiry”.
The review is being led by John Scott QC, who previously chaired an independent advisory group to the Scottish Government on the police tactic of stop and search. It will make its recommendations by June.
He is being assisted by an advisory panel, including former MP and MSP Dennis Canavan, ex-assistant chief constable Kate Thomson and Glasgow University’s professor Jim Murdoch.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel