FORMER first minister Alex Salmond has released a statement regarding his legal victory over the Scottish Government.
Salmond had taken the Government to court over alleged unfairness in its procedure of investigating sexual harassment claims against him, which he denies.
At the Court of Session this morning, the Government admitted that it did not follow the correct procedure when dealing with the accusations and accepted legal defeat.
READ MORE: Scottish government admits 'failure' in dealing with Salmond accusations
The Government said it had acted outside of its own guidelines, having appointed the case to an individual with "prior involvement" with the allegations.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This is the full statement from Alex Salmond
I am deeply appreciative of the work of my legal team who have been outstanding in delivering what is an emphatic victory, grateful to my family and friends who have stood with me throughout the last year, and thankful to the more than 4000 people who contributed to the crowd funder for this Judicial Review, without whose support I would not have been able to defend my position.
I pledged that any surplus remaining would be entirely devoted to good causes in Scotland and beyond. That will now happen.
As I reflect on the last difficult months, I am mindful of three things.
First, that this process was completely unnecessary. Over the last year my legal team repeatedly offered the Scottish Government legal arbitration to resolve any complaints, and to establish the illegality of this process, without the need for such a damaging and expensive case to come to court. To my great regret, all such proposals were rejected, leaving me with no choice but to bring this matter to the Court of Session.
As a result, Leslie Evans, the Permanent Secretary, has wasted huge amounts of public money in an incompetent attempt to enforce an unlawful process. Now, having incurred these costs to the public purse, she has collapsed the case prior to a full hearing.
Secondly, the Scottish Government’s conduct in this case as an institution has unquestionably lacked candour. Officials repeatedly failed to disclose documents to the court which were of central importance. These documents ultimately made clear the apparent bias and procedural unfairness which has only now been admitted. As a former first minister, I find that conduct entirely unworthy.
These documents remain confidential as part of the court process, for now. But in my view they reveal a clear and obvious breach of the principles of fairness and natural justice. It is a matter of great personal sadness that I have had to bring the Scottish Government to court simply to ensure that those within it are acting fairly, honestly and with due regard for the law.
Thirdly, I want to record my profound unease about the systematic leaking of this matter, from wherever that occurred. Any complaints process requires to be confidential in order to be fair to those making complaints, and fair to those about whom complaints are made.
In the leaking of those details to the media, rights of privacy and confidentiality have been blatantly disregarded.
That was done deliberately, and to inflict the maximum damage to my reputation. It included the leaking of detailed complaints to a tabloid newspaper, complaints which I emphatically dispute. It included also the briefing of the supposed advice of the Lord Advocate to the press. That breaches a fundamental constitutional principle – that of the independence of the criminal justice system from political interference.
From the outset, I have argued both that the decision made by the Permanent Secretary was unfair, biased and unlawful and that I have never engaged in any criminality.
The first point has been established. The second point I believe will follow.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel