THE last British governor of Hong Kong urged respect for Taiwan today following new threats from "autocratic" China.
In an address earlier this month, Chinese president Xi Jinping called independence for the island state, which China refuses to recognise, "a dead end".
Calling for reunification after Taiwan's near-90 years of practical autonomy, Xi said he would "make no promise to give up the use of military force and reserve the option of taking all necessary means”.
Today Chris Patten, a Tory peer, said: "There isn't in human history an example of a democracy agreeing to become part of a tyranny without being obliged to do it."
Patten led the administration of Hong Kong from 1992-97, when the former British colony returned to China.
Xi has suggested the "one country, two systems" approach adopted for the governance of Hong Kong could apply to Taiwan.
However, appearing before an enquiry of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Patten said Beijing had "rolled back" on several aspects of that framework.
Over successive years, he said the region had gone from being "one of the freest cities in Asia" to one where academic freedoms, public protests and human rights had been hit.
He went on: "It's extraordinary that it has taken an autocratic Chinese government in Beijing to produce an independence movement in Hong Kong. With the colonial oppressors, there was no independence movement."
Authorities in Hong Kong came under fire in 2014 over the treatment of pro-democracy protestors.
Mainly students, they became known as the Umbrella Movement due to their use of the accessory and were targeted with tear gas, with gangs of unknown men physically attacking peaceful encampments.
Patten, a former European Commissioner, said these protestors had a "real sense of citizenship" and are "very Chinese, very patriotic", but "believe in the rule of law and in letting people get on with their own lives" and in holding government to account.
Describing the relationship between the UK and China during preparations for the handover of Hong Kong, Patten said there were "practical and moral embarrassments" on both sides.
He stated: "On the Chinese side they were dealing with a territory that had been stolen from them, ripped from them, by colonial powers in the 19th century, unequal treaties and all that.
"There was a huge embarrassment for them because more than half of the population of Hong Kong were refugees from communism in China, who had swum, who had climbed over razorwire.
"It was embarrassing for us because of the history.
"Every other colony or territory which we were responsible for, we would prepare sometimes under duress, for independence.
"We would introduce democratic institutions. Sometimes they worked, sometimes they didn't.
"That was never going to be possible in Hong Kong."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here