THE Brexit chaos engulfing Britain makes the case for Scottish independence "increasingly clear", Nicola Sturgeon said.
The First Minister, who headed to London on Wednesday morning ahead of the no confidence vote in Theresa May's Government, said it was "not obvious" that the PM "has any real idea what to do next".
The SNP leader spoke after the Prime Minister suffered a historic defeat in the House of Commons, with MPs rejecting the withdrawal agreement she has negotiated by a majority of 230.
While the Tory leader is expected to survive the vote of no confidence, what will happen next with regards to exiting the European Union is less clear.
Sturgeon's SNP, as well as the Liberal Democrats, are calling for the issue to be put to the people again in a second referendum, but Labour favours a general election.
The First Minister spoke to May following Tuesday night's historic defeat in the Commons - which was the biggest government defeat on a meaningful vote for at least a century.
She tweeted that while she had had talks with the Conservative leader, it was "not obvious that she has any real idea what to do next".
Sturgeon added: "Also not at all clear she is open to any fundamental change of thinking in her proposed cross party talks.
"The bare minimum she must do now is seek extension of Article 50 to stop the clock."
As she headed to London to meet SNP MPs, including Westminster leader Ian Blackford, she stated: "We want UK to stay in EU which is why we back a #PeoplesVote.
"But it is becoming increasingly clear that Scotland's wider interests will only be protected with independence."
Tory MPs however accused the First Minister of using the Brexit vote to push for a second independence referendum.
Stephen Kerr, the Conservative MP for Stirling, told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland: "The SNP has been clear again this morning by Nicola Sturgeon's tweet, they are only interested in this subject for one reason and that is to bring about the second independence referendum.
"Nicola Sturgeon was up at the crack of dawn on her way to London and she took time to tweet about a second independence referendum."
Kerr, who voted for the withdrawal agreement, added: "Whenever it looks like the SNP might be in a position where they are prepared to talk in substance about how we bring about an orderly Brexit, they change their position, because they are not interested in an orderly Brexit, what they are interested in is a chaotic Brexit."
Fellow Tory Douglas Ross, who voted against the Brexit deal, hit out: "The SNP don't want a good deal or a deal at all."
He claimed Scottish nationalists "want to disrupt Brexit as much as possible and use it as a tool to enhance their chances of holding and winning a second independence referendum".
Ross also told BBC Radio Scotland that the massive scale of the PM's defeat could encourage the other European nations to look again at the deal and make changes to it.
He said: "The comprehensive defeat of this deal, mainly around the backstop issue, will focus minds both in the United Kingdom but more importantly in the European Union because they also want a deal, they don't want a no-deal Brexit."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel