THERESA May has refused to back down on her hated Brexit deal, despite Tuesday night’s humiliating defeat.
Immediately after her agreement with the EU was rejected in the Commons by 432 votes to 202, the Prime Minister promised to hold “constructive” cross party meetings to identify a Brexit plan that would win the support of MPs.
But yesterday there was little sign that she was willing to shift too far from the deal that had been so roundly opposed.
“If none of PM’s red lines change, what progress can she possibly make?” Nicola Sturgeon wrote on Twitter.
To get Labour on board, May would need to agree to a softer-Brexit, keeping the UK in a customs union with EU.
To get support from the DUP and the ERG, she would need to scrap the backstop in the Withdrawal Agreement, but the EU have insisted that will not and cannot change.
Another option being floated by a number of Tory and Labour MPs, and previously the Scottish Government, is the so-called Norway plus model.
This would scrap the need for the backstop, and see the UK being part of the European Economic Area by becoming a member of the European Free Trade Association.
But it would force May to give up one of her most fundamental red lines, ending free movement of people.
During an interview with the BBC, Justice Secretary David Gauke had suggested the Government could be “flexible” on discussions around a customs union.
But speaking to reporters afterwards, May’s official spokesperson said this was not the case: “The principles that govern us as we go into these talks is that we want to, among other things, be able to do our own trade deals and that is incompatible with membership of either a or the customs union.”
The SNP’s Stewart McDonald was one of many MPs to push May on the issue in parliament “The deal defeated last night is a product of the Prime Minister’s own red lines.
“Which of those red lines is she willing to give up in order to get the compromise she seeks?”
May insisted she would be “approaching these discussions in a constructive spirit”, but said there was a need for the government to “deliver on the referendum result and deliver Brexit.”
Labour MP Yvette Cooper said the Prime Minister was acting as if her deal had been “defeated by 30 and not 230” votes.
May replied: “What I want to see is what the British people voted for. They voted for an end to free movement, they voted for an independent trade policy, they voted to end the jurisdiction of the European court of justice. And it is incumbent on this parliament to ensure that we deliver on that.”
Jeremy Corbyn said May was in “denial” about “the scale of the defeat” her deal had suffered.
The Tory’s leader unwillingness to shift fuelled speculation she was going to bring her rejected deal back.
One cabinet minister said Evening Standard that there could be at least “one or two more votes” on the withdrawal agreement.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel