DAVID Mundell has effectively ruled out holding a second European referendum – saying while the Prime Minister is willing to discuss "anything" in talks with other parties, the discussions would "not be a cover for trying to stop Brexit".
The Scottish Secretary also said calls to take a no-deal Brexit "off the table" – as demanded by Labour's Jeremy Corbyn – were "the wrong starting point", adding that he did not believe the European Union would extend the timetable for the Article 50 talks.
Mundell spoke out after Theresa May saw her proposed withdrawal agreement defeated by a record margin in the House of Commons, before going on to survive a vote of no confidence.
Mundell, who has been in the Cabinet since the Tories came to power in 2010, admitted he had "not anticipated the scale of the defeat" the Government suffered on Tuesday night.
Immediately after last night's no confidence vote, May announced she would invite party leaders in the Commons and other MPs for talks, in a bid to find a deal that could command the support of Parliament.
But SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said those discussions must include extending Article 50, ruling out a no-deal Brexit and the possibility of staging a so-called People's Vote.
Blackford told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme: "We will accept our responsibility to engage positively in talks but it has to be on the basis that there is a positive engagement.
"I've written to the Prime Minister overnight and said that what has to happen is there has to be an agreement that we can have discussions about extending Article 50, about taking no deal off the table, and about having a People's Vote."
Blackford continued: "I actually think on the basis of where we are a People's Vote is the right way to go, I think on the basis of the paralysis in Parliament we ought to put that back to the people.
"I'm not saying that is a position the Prime Minister would support but if she is serious about engagement, if she is serious about trying to find a way through this, she has at least got to have that discussion about these options."
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeted: "So everything is not on the table. PM's offer of talks is a promise to listen, but only if we all agree with her. The SNP won't be complicit in more time wasting."
But Mundell stressed the aim of discussions would be to "get a deal through Parliament so we can have an orderly exit from the EU."
The Tory MP, also speaking to BBC Radio Scotland, conceded that after the scale of Tuesday night's defeat the Government could not just "bring back exactly the same proposal".
He stated: "I had not anticipated the scale of the defeat, it means that there will have to be changes."
But he also said the talks had to take place "on the basis of getting to a deal, not getting to a point of stopping Brexit".
Speaking about the Prime Minister, Mundell said: "She's not going down a route to stop Brexit, she is willing to discuss anything people want to put on the table to get us to a point where we can get a majority in Parliament to support a deal to allow an orderly Brexit.
"Everything is up for discussion but what isn't going to be an outcome is arrangements that seek to stop Brexit, which I believe the People's Vote is designed to do.
"Not only that it would be extremely divisive in our country. We've had a People's Vote, people voted across the United Kingdom and a United Kingdom-wide vote to leave the EU, and we are respecting the result of that and seeking to deliver Brexit, but an orderly Brexit.
"That's what discussions are about. Of course people can raise any issues that they want, but the discussions are not a cover for trying to stop Brexit."
Conservative Party chairman Brandon Lewis has also insisted that the Government did not believe a People's Vote was "the right way to go".
Lewis also said ministers were determined the UK should be able to have an independent trade policy after leaving Europe – adding this ruled out any suggestion of remaining in the customs union.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel