THE SNP have furiously hit out at a tabloid newspaper after they published a story in which it was claimed a party webpage had recently been rewritten to cut out Alex Salmond.
The Sun said yesterday that a section which details the SNP’s history on www.snp.org appeared to have been changed on January 15, removing all mentions of the former First Minister.
READ MORE: Sturgeon 'victim of a smear campaign' over Salmond allegations
It’s not clear where this information or the date came from. An archive search of the website using the Wayback Machine tool, which allows users to read old version of internet pages, has a saved version of the “History” page from September which is the exact same as its current state. This suggests this particular page hasn’t been updated in at least four months.
An old version of a now-unavailable page called “Our Party” can be still be found in using the archive tool. This did mention Salmond, but it also appears to have been written several years ago, as it doesn’t have a section on the independence referendum and also still refers to him as party “leader”.
The story was quickly picked up by other Unionist media outlets, including the Times and the Evening News.
READ MORE: What SNP MPs and MSPs think about Salmond allegation row
The National understands that the SNP website has undergone two redesigns since Salmond stepped down as leader in 2014.
The history page is one of the least active pages on the site, is rarely updated, and the party claims it hasn’t been changed for several months.
In the section about indyref1, the new history says: “The 2014 independence referendum was Scotland’s greatest ever democratic event. In the months building up to the vote, the Yes campaign – spearheaded by the SNP and its then depute leader Nicola Sturgeon – engaged with every community in Scotland. Support for independence reached record highs and levels of political participation blossomed across the country.”
READ MORE: Holyrood to hold inquiry into handling of Salmond allegations
An SNP spokesperson told The National the story was “rubbish” last night. “The Sun concocted this nonsense by comparing a single page of the SNP website from 2011 with its 2019 variant. Alex features as leader in 2011, and Nicola in the latest version,” they said.
The Sun reported that Salmond had said: “Nicola should stop rewriting history and concentrate on making history by taking Scotland to independence.”
Tomorrow’s Sunday National will have the first in-depth interview with Salmond since he won his legal case against the Scottish Government, in which he addresses the Unionist press and the alleged “civil war”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel