THE links between animal cruelty, child abuse and violent adults will be examined at a landmark conference.
Social workers and psychologists will be told to look at pets when assessing families, while vets will be encouraged to consider potential harm in households presenting animals with recurrent or unusual injuries.
Put together by the Scottish SPCA and Edinburgh University, the September event will also draw on US expertise.
Psychology professor Jo Williams said: “This landmark conference will be the first in the UK to focus on animal cruelty and its links to adverse childhood experiences and human violence.
“By bringing a range of professionals together, and highlighting cruelty as a cross-profession societal issue, we will focus on what we can all do within our professions to promote both animal welfare and young people’s health, safety and development.”
Police, teachers and health workers are amongst those set to attend the Edinburgh conference, which will call for new approach to animals and abuse across both public and private sectors.
Organisers hope greater knowledge and more partnership working will help “protect the health and safety of all animals and young people”.
A new expert guide to help practitioners is expected from the Scottish SPCA and Edinburgh University next year.
Gilly Mendes Ferreira, head of education and policy at the Scottish SPCA, told The National: “Often vets will see a dog with an injured leg and hear things like ‘the dog fell off the table’. Dogs don’t tend to fall off tables and the injuries won’t match up with the story.
“Sometimes animals will come in three times over four months. What is happening in that household to mean that animal sustains that degree of injury?
“What has become really clear is the lack of understanding of even asking questions. If you are a psychologist or a social worker, animals won’t appear on your screening questions, even though we know animal cruelty is a potential precursor to violent crime and children can harm animals because they themselves are being harmed or are witnessing things in the household.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article