LABOUR could still back a second Brexit referendum, Jeremy Corbyn said as he urged Theresa May to accept his demands for a deal.
The Labour leader said the option of a public vote remained on the table – in line with the policy agreed following marathon negotiations at his party's conference in 2018.
Corbyn had faced a backlash from pro-EU Labour MPs after setting out his conditions for accepting a Brexit deal in a letter to the Prime Minister.
But Corbyn said the party's policy remained as set out following the party conference – to call for a general election if May cannot get a deal through Parliament and then to keep all options open.
In a speech in Coventry, Corbyn accused May of an "utterly cynical" and "reckless" attempt to run down the clock before the UK's exit from the European Union on March 29.
He said Labour's plan "could win the support of Parliament and bring the country together" but May has so far "chosen the path of division".
"If she is unable to adopt a sensible deal because it would split the Tories, then the answer is quite simple: there must be a general election," Corbyn said.
The Prime Minister survived a confidence motion in her government tabled by Corbyn, which could have led to an election, after her Brexit deal was overwhelmingly rejected by MPs in January.
Corbyn said that without an election "we will keep all options on the table – as agreed in our conference motion -including the option of a public vote".
He said: "The country cannot be taken over the cliff edge for the sake of Tory party unity."
The Labour leader said May must drop her "damaging red lines" on Brexit and insisted his plan "can break the impasse" in Parliament.
In his letter to May, the Labour leader set out five demands:
- A permanent customs union to deliver frictionless trade and help avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland
- Close alignment with the single market, including shared institutions and obligations
- Alignment on rights and protections so that UK standards keep pace with those across Europe as a minimum
- Participation in EU agencies and funding programmes
- Unambiguous agreements on the detail of future security arrangements, including access to the European Arrest Warrant and vital shared databases.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel