A failed UKIP candidate who has appeared in the BBC's Question Time audience four times has claimed he was invited on to the show to fill the audience with more right-wing voices.
William Mitchell, who has now appeared on the show more often than most SNP politicians, became the centre of a row around bias in the BBC after eagle-eyed viewers complained about his re-curring appearances.
According to The Times, the loyalist claims that he was invited by the show's producer to appear in the unionist-heavy audience in Motherwell last week, in part to make up a shortage of conservative speakers.
READ MORE: These are the six questions the BBC MUST now answer about anti-SNP ranter
Audience members usually go through a process of applying to be on the show while answering key questions about political affiliations,voting history and if they have been on the programme before.
Mitchell claims that he was personally invited to appear on the pilot of Debate Night, the new Scottish equivalent of Question Time, but when he called to clarify details he was then invited to appear on both shows.
He was only asked if he was a member of a political party.
Mitchell claims that the BBC know his political affiliations due to his multiple appearances on previous shows, and that the BBC sent him “offers for tickets all the time”.
READ MORE: BBC's Question Time farce is nothing new for independence movement
He has also used his social media to post support for the Ulster Young Militants, the youth wing of unionist terrorist organisations, the UDA, and he’s no fan of catholics, using the word “Taig” in one online comment.
Mitchell picked up just 34 votes when standing for Ukip in Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill in 2013.
The BBC said that they did sometimes invite people to ensure a balance of views in the audience, before concluding: “We want to allow as many people as possible the chance to be part of the programme so we would not normally allocate a seat to someone if they had appeared recently. There is a detailed application process.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel