I WAS struck by the comments from arch-Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg on Question Time justifying concentration camps set up by the British army in South Africa during the Boer War (1899-1902). He further compounded matters by arguing that Glasgow had the same death rate as those interned in these camps.
The camps were originally set up as refugee camps for civilians families forced to abandon their homes due to the war. However, when Lord Kitchener took over the British campaign in 1900 he launched a scorched-earth policy which included the burning down of farms and slaughtering of livestock, as well as the poisoning of wells.
READ MORE: Rees-Mogg compares concentration camp death rate to Glasgow mortality figures
Tens of thousands of men, women and children were forced into concentration camps, and while the vast majority of captured men were sent overseas, the camps became largely populated by women and children. Rations were meagre and two-tiered, with smaller rations for the families of men still fighting.
Disease and starvation killed more than 28,000, around one in four of those Boers interned, 22,000 of which were children. Twenty thousand black Africans also died of about 80,000 interned.
Mr Rees-Mogg is also well wide of the mark in comparing this death rate to that of Glasgow at the time. Camp deaths were a horrifying 24,000 out of 100,000 of the population, more than 10 times that of Glasgow which was 2,124 per 100,000.
Before pontificating with such authority, as Mr Rees-Mogg is often prone to do, he should clearly check his facts.
Alex Orr
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel