JEREMY Corbyn yesterday called for Westminster’s opposition parties to come together and “break the Brexit impasse”.
In separate letters to Ian Blackford, Vince Cable, Plaid Cymru’s Liz Saville Roberts and Caroline Lucas of the Greens, the Labour leader asked for a meeting at the “earliest opportunity” to “discuss how we can work together to urgently find and facilitate a consensus in the House of Commons”.
READ MORE: MPs have voted to delay Brexit ... so what the hell happens now?
But the plea confused the other party chiefs, who have been meeting to discuss Brexit for the last two years, as just 24 hours earlier they had asked Corbyn to come and meet them. The Labour leader ignored that request in his letter, which said it was incumbent on Parliamentarians to “do our best work together and find a compromise and a solution that ends the needless uncertainty and worry that the Government’s failed Brexit negotiations have caused”.
Corbyn said his party’s plans for a “permanent customs union, single market deal and dynamic alignment on rights and protections” as a well as “a public vote” would be a “starting point for any discussions”.
He added: “We are keen to see if there is scope to find common ground between our respective proposals”.
In a joint response, Blackford, Cable, Saville Roberts and Lucas said a second Brexit referendum would be key to any negotiations.
In their letter, they said they would “welcome a meeting of the various parties in the House that are supporting a People’s Vote, to coordinate our approach and maximise the chances of success”.
The letter says: “We have been working cross-party since 2016, in particular in relation to a People’s Vote, and would like this item to be at the top of the agenda.”
“We are all agreed that no deal would be a disaster but this is not yet reflected in legislation, and the issue of revocation may well come to the fore in the next few days.
“We believe this must also be a priority in our discussions.”
READ MORE: Ian Blackford accuses Labour of being a 'fraud' over position on Brexit vote
The four have asked to meet Corbyn and his shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, on Monday afternoon.
Blackford said he was glad Corbyn would join the others, “after two years of declining invitations to talk”.
Meanwhile, Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay has threatened to quit the Government over plans to delay Britain’s departure from the EU.
The Tory was mocked mercilessly on Thursday night when he delivered an impassioned speech in the Commons urging colleagues to support Theresa May’s motion calling for an extension to the Article 50 process – before then promptly walking through the “no” lobby to oppose an extension to the Article 50 process.
If he does quit he will be the third Brexit Secretary to have left May’s Government. David Davis resigned in July and Dominic Raab left the Cabinet in November.
Barclay told the BBC UK should not accept more than a short “technical” extension to Brexit.
European Council president Donald Tusk met Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte in The Hague yesterday to discuss whether the EU will be prepared to extend Article 50.
Talks with key bloc power brokers Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron will take place on Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel