WHEN I started in the film industry 20 years ago it seemed sensible to stay in Scotland rather than joining the rat race in LA or London – and it was an exciting time. Films such as Trainspotting and Shallow Grave were making our country cool again and there was a small but smart and exciting community of talented and competitive film-makers at the starting blocks of their careers (Lynne Ramsay, Peter Mullan and David Mackenzie to name a few).
We had no idea how lucky we were, having lots of fun working and playing hard, shaping our futures in an environment that was easy and supportive, within a solid and functioning infrastructure populated by motivated and determined people who were all there to help us achieve our dreams.
We punched above our weight and we were regulars at every A-list festival in the world, where our work was proudly featured and the awards and nominations rolled in.
Our position of strength was mainly due to the fact that we had a film agency (Scottish Screen) dedicated to developing, producing and promoting work around the world. Together with the Glasgow Film Office it was empowered not only to attract film-makers from overseas to shoot in Scotland but at the same time grow and fund the indigenous industry and all its ancillary activities.
The Edinburgh International Film Festival was one of the world’s most exciting festivals in the world.
Then... bam! In 2006, we were told it was all over. One fairly stupid money-saving decision by Jack McConnell’s government and we were told we were losing our screen agency. Scottish Screen – as well as the Arts Council – was to be scrapped and all of the various sections of the arts and their governing bodies were to be housed under a new umbrella organisation called Creative Scotland. For the next few years, we could only watch as our precious industry was brutally dismantled.
At the time we were up in arms and many of us Scottish producers launched a campaign to lobby the government to keep our agency, but to no avail.
Meanwhile, there was also a change at Glasgow City Chambers, and suddenly our healthy film support unit and its film funds were cut. Perhaps the most destructive blow was the decision to move the Edinburgh Film Festival from August to June to save money. That was an instant guarantee that the thousands of agents, distributors, film-makers, directors, actors and financiers that regularly came to Scotland would not be coming back.
Ironically, I’d just founded Film City Glasgow after 10 years of development. I couldn’t abandon ship. It was with horror that we could only sit back and watch the exodus as everyone went elsewhere to find work and funding, and soon the pulse had disappeared from the Scottish industry.
We at Sigma, the production company I co-founded, were the lucky ones. By this point we had made our first features and had developed enough experience and networks that we could reach out to other countries for help. We could stay, although it wasn’t going to be pretty. It was going to be lonely and hard and depressing. For the generation coming through, it was sadly all over. There were no opportunities, only a few crumbs left on the table. Anyone with any sense left.
We waited in hope that when Creative Scotland was finally up and running there would be a change – but it was a mess. We sympathised with the remaining “screen” employees it had carried over from Scottish Screen, who had to work underneath new bosses who knew absolutely nothing about our industry or anyone who worked in it. In the end, it took until 2010 to get Creative Scotland up and running. Unfortunately, it took much, much longer for it to be functioning.
After several years of stagnation, in 2013 Creative Scotland published a review of the film sector. It screamed ‘‘market failure’’ and not long afterwards I was invited to give evidence at a Scottish Government inquiry at Holyrood. I gave an honest account of what had happened and the devastating effect on the industry.
I watched the MSPs’ shocked faces as I described how hopeless Scotland’s industry had become compared to other small countries around the world.
Many of the independent producers in Glasgow and Edinburgh united to form a lobbying group, Independent Producers Scotland, who spearheaded the campaign to put Scotland back on screen. We persuaded the Scottish Government to launch another inquiry into the sector, and this time the Culture, Tourism and External Relations Committee invited the opinions of some of the most senior heavyweights in the industry, including John McCormick (former BBC controller), Iain Smith (Mad Max: Fury Road producer) and Tommy Gormley (Star Wars producer). All of them confirmed what we’d already told them. The industry in Scotland was dead. There was no argument. This was embarrassing.
Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop recognised that major steps had to be taken and, as well as formally asking the various government agencies to form a partnership, she announced the formation of a task force whose mandate was to come up with a remedy.
Given the amount of negativity and blame that was flying around, the industry’s corporate relationships were in tatters and at this point there were some very difficult and tense meetings taking place.
Thankfully, someone had the wisdom to appoint John McCormick to chair the Screen Leadership Group, which would consist of a cross-section of independent producers as well as Creative Scotland executives, Scottish Enterprise employees and government and council officials.
It took a further two years to complete what we set out to do: work with the government to come up with a plan that would turn the industry around. People lost or left their jobs. The stress was palpable. But John McCormick spoke to people individually, listened carefully to everything everyone had to say and gently shepherded us back to a place where we could be constructive and supportive.
At this point, the main area of contention was whether we needed to reinstate our former screen agency or empower the screen department within Creative Scotland.
Having watched the dismantling of the previous agency and realising the time and cost involved in creating a new one, we finally all agreed that the best option was to work with and enhance what we already had, bearing in mind that those within the screen department at Creative Scotland were extremely in tune and up-to-speed with the state of play, not to mention desperate to find a solution.
Fiona Hyslop kept her word. She gave us everything we asked for. She doubled the budget for the screen sector and set about putting in place the personnel, the resources and the strategies we needed, and at the end of 2018, our dedicated screen unit -– Screen Scotland – was formed. Isabel Davis, who had previously been head of international at the British Film Institute, joined as executive director of the new organisation. Hallelujah!
Now, Scotland is reaping the rewards of our biggest ever year in 2018. Not only did the Outlaw King grace our screens but so did Mary Queen of Scots.
We have a new leader, a new screen organisation and double the funding we ever had. We’ve made the biggest ever Scottish film and finally there’s a studio on the horizon. Our industry is worth well over £100 million and is only set to rise. Confidence has returned.
The knock-on effects are impressive. Tour operators are reporting a 160% rise in business and tourism is up by 41% year on year.
Everywhere we look there are opportunities for new entrants. I take my hat off to all those involved in turning our industry around. Needless to say, this should only be the beginning…
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel