TWITTER users have hit out at the BBC's "frankly pathetic" hounding of Speaker John Bercow.
A BBC reporter quizzed Bercow on ruling out a third meaningful vote unless Theresa May brings a new deal to the Commons.
frankly pathetic that @BBCNews is hounding the Speaker like this. Come on guys, there are other far more culpable people you could be 'doorstepping'pic.twitter.com/AWnx60Qnm1
— Ian Fraser (@Ian_Fraser) March 19, 2019
By invoking the so-called 1604 rule, Bercow has thrown down the gauntlet to the PM and her Government.
The only way forward for them is to either change the standing orders of the Commons – they do not have the majority for that – or end the Parliamentary session by calling a general election.
"It's a very old rule", the BBC journalist said, running behind Bercow as he tries to get away.
Trying to distract the reporter, Bercow comments on someone's hat and says the reporter should have accepted his "kind offer" of tea or coffee.
"I'm sure people are so very grateful to you for showing such an interest at this time in the morning ... well done," he says sarcastically.
But the reporter kept persisting, saying Bercow said in January that "Parliament can't rely on old precedents".
READ MORE: Explained: The '1604 rule' cited by Speaker ... and a question for all Scots
Bercow told the reporter to be careful as he crossed the road, saying "I'm not going to sacrifice myself because of you. I know you attach great weight to what I think."
When asked if he is trying to delay Brexit, Bercow does not reply and keeps walking away.
As the BBC reporter continues to ask the same questions, Bercow says: "Perhaps gentleman, you would allow me to proceed to work. Have a good day, thank you."
Twitter users were quick to point out how inappropriate the BBC's persistent harassment of Bercow was, with one suggesting he should put on a mask of Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson.
Someone tell Bercow to put on a Ruth Davidson mask. The BBC stop doorstepping him immediately. https://t.co/1vK5FSWPf2
— Indyref2 (@IndyrefTWO) March 19, 2019
Others Tweeters pointed out how serious harassment is. Clause 3 of the Indpependent Press Standards Oragnisation's Editors' Code says journalists "must not engage in intimidation, harassment or persistent pursuit".
Since doing his job yesterday, Speaker John Bercow has been attacked from all sides. The tabloids are in full smear mode, even the BBC harassed him on his way to work. Victims of media harassment will know how this feels.
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) March 19, 2019
Please give this a retweet if you support Bercow’s stance
Bercow has shown courage in doing his job, rather than in being anyone's yes man. Then BBC harassment this morning was disgraceful. #IStandWithBercow
— Julia Larden (@JuliaLarden) March 19, 2019
Others hit out at the BBC's unbalanced reporting, saying that the broadcaster will hold anyone to account apart from the Tories.
Which idiotic reporter is this @BBCNews @BBCPolitics ? It’s positively dangerous cross examining John Bercow as he crosses a busy road. This BBC reporter is like the one who doorstepped Corbyn. There is a pattern - hold anyone to account bar the Tory govt pic.twitter.com/88H2KC45AQ
— Kevin Pascoe (@KevinPascoe) March 19, 2019
Also, very poor from @BBCNews https://t.co/Xkzena9m2K The speaker has been entirely balanced in his statements, the BBC is quite unbalanced in their reporting. Bercow's agenda is to be Speaker, what is the BBC's?
— Jeff Kaye (@Jakdaw09) March 19, 2019
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel