THE UK Home Office has quoted bloodthirsty passages from the bible in a rejection letter to an Iranian asylum seeker, which his immigration caseworker worker has described as “unbelievably offensive diatribe”.
In his application, the man said he had converted to Christianity because it was more peaceful than his original religion Islam.
However, the Home Office rejected his claim, with the refusal letter quoting the biblical books of Leviticus and Revelation. The letter read: “In Leviticus, chapter 26, God states ‘You will pursue your enemies, and they will fall by the sword before you. Five of you will chase a hundred, and a hundreds of you will chase ten thousand, and your enemies will fall by the sword before you’.
“Similarly, the book of Revelation is filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death and violence … These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it as a ‘peaceful’ religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge.”
Redacted images of the rejection letter were shared online by London immigration caseworker Nathan Stevens, who specialises in applications based on religious conversion.
He said had had previously received refusal letters with similar remarks, and added: “I’ve seen a lot over the years, but even I was genuinely shocked to read this unbelievably offensive diatribe being used to justify a refusal of asylum.”
Another refusal said the applicant had said Jesus was their saviour, but he would not be able to save them from the Iranian regime, adding: “It is therefore considered that you have no conviction in your faith and your belief in Jesus is half-hearted.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “This letter is not in accordance with our policy approach to claims based on religious persecution, including conversions to a particular faith.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel