WE’LL leave no-one behind. That was the straight-forward commitment made by the First Minister four years when she committed Scotland to the Sustainable Development Goals.
The Global Goals – adopted by 193 countries – symbolise a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030.
At the heart of the Goals is a pledge to achieve them for everyone. The statistics on poverty and inequality levels in Scotland threaten to undermine that promise.
If we’re going to tackle Scotland’s poverty problem, then we can’t think of it in isolation. As poverty levels have risen, so too has economic inequality. We know these challenges are deeply linked: we can’t seek to tackle poverty without also reducing inequality.
READ MORE: Scottish inequality gap increases as poverty deepens
The incomes of the top 10% of the population are over a quarter more than the bottom 40% put together.
Poverty in Scotland is not an issue of scarcity; it’s about how our collective income and wealth are shared. Clearly, it makes no economic or moral sense to have so much money in so few hands while one in five people in Scotland live below the breadline. There’s enough wealth in Scotland to give everyone a fair chance in life.
Of course, this trend isn’t just true in Scotland; it’s repeating itself all over the world. Earlier this year, Oxfam revealed that while billionaires’ total wealth increased by $2.5 billion a day, the combined wealth of the poorest half of the world dropped 11 per cent.
Like poverty, there is nothing inevitable about today’s extreme economic inequality and Scotland doesn’t have to be swept up in the tide of rising inequalities.
While not all power to tackle this issue rests with Holyrood, we can use the levers of the Scottish Parliament to do things differently, and to reverse this damaging trend.
We must build an economy that makes people, not profits, the bottom line and, in doing so, demonstrate that global progress towards a more human economy is possible.
Encouragingly, some of the foundations for a fairer country have already been laid in Scotland. Politicians, across all parties, say they want to reduce economic inequality but, despite some welcome initiatives, it is clear the level of action is not enough. A similar warning has also been made by Scotland’s independent Poverty and Inequality Commission.
This summer, the Commission will become a permanent public body, with the power to hold Ministers accountable on their progress towards reducing poverty and inequality whilst also proposing stretching new policy actions.
One of the first issues it is examining is housing wealth inequalities: how the wealthiest 10% own over nine times more household wealth than the bottom 40% combined. Clearly, this is an area where action could be taken to help spread our nation’s wealth more evenly.
Now is the time to act using the full range of Holyrood’s tax and spending powers.
Later this year, both the Scottish and UK Governments will voluntarily report on the progress made on delivering the Sustainable Development Goals.
But it’s already clear that unless our political leaders, at home and around the world, commit to the concrete steps needed to reduce the gap between rich and poor; the Goal of ending poverty will remain out of reach – both globally, and here in Scotland.
Rhiannon Sims is a policy and research officer for Oxfam Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here