THERESA May lost two of her ministers yesterday as the shock decision to try and find a Brexit compromise with Jeremy Corbyn left her MPs reeling.
Wales Minister Nigel Adams resigned from government just moments before he was due to answer questions in Parliament. He told May she was trying to “cook up a deal with a Marxist”.
Meanwhile, Chris Heaton Harris became the EIGHTH minister to leave the Department for Exiting the EU in less than three years.
In his resignation letter, he told the Prime Minister that the UK should have “honoured the result of the 2016 referendum” and left the EU on March 29.
Heaton also claimed the UK was far more prepared for a hard Brexit than May was letting on: “In my current job, I’ve had the responsibility of helping to coordinate our preparations for if we were to leave the European Union without a negotiated deal.
READ MORE: Why Brexiteer yobs are doing lasting damage to UK
“As I believe you know, these preparations are well advanced and whilst I would have preferred to leave the European Union with your deal, I truly believe our country would have swiftly overcome any immediate issues of leaving without a deal and gone on to thrive.”
Heaton-Harris warned the Prime Minister that “every time we seek an extension to this process we diminish faith in our political system and the good people, from all political parties, who serve within it”.
And he added: “I simply cannot support any further extension to Article 50 and this obviously means I cannot stay in Government.”
The Tory leader faced a bruising session at Prime Minister’s Questions, with her own MPs questioning the decision to work with Corbyn.
Lee Rowley reminded May that last week she had described Corbyn as “the biggest threat to our standing in the world, to our defence and to our economy”.
“In her judgment, what now qualifies him for involvement in Brexit?” he asked.
The normally loyal Caroline Johnson asked May: “If it comes to the point when we have to balance the risk of a no-deal Brexit versus the risk of letting down the country and ushering in a Marxist, anti-Semite-led Government, what does she think, at that point, is the lowest risk?”
READ MORE: FM needs to be at Brexit table – but she must have the courage to say ‘enough is enough’
Writing in the Telegraph, former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, described May’s offer to Corbyn as betrayal.
“The spectre of Corbyn lording it over us in a prime ministerial way as he wrecks Brexit makes my blood run cold and fear for my party and my country.”
Brexiteer Tory MPs were plotting last night on the best way to get the Prime Minister out of Number 10. One motion being circulated even suggested docking the pay of cabinet ministers.
Under Tory party rules May is safe for the moment, after the failure of last December’s vote of no confidence.
It cannot now be repeated for at least eight months. Mark Francois, the ERG’s deputy chair, said he would submit a letter of no confidence anyway.
The only way for her to be kicked out is if Corbyn tables a motion of no confidence in the Government.
In a letter to her MPs, the Prime Minister blamed the ERG and the DUP for her need to ask Corbyn for help.
“The question is, how can we get parliament to ratify the deal? The Government would have preferred to do so based on Conservative and DUP votes.
“But, having tried three times, it is clear that is unlikely to happen,” she wrote.
“I realise some of you will be concerned about the government discussing the way forward with the opposition. However, with some colleagues unwilling to support the government in the division lobbies, this is the only way to deliver the smooth, orderly, Brexit that we promised and for which the British people voted.”
According to research by the Institute for Government, May has now lost more ministers in the first three months of 2019 than any other recent Prime Minister lost in a full year. There are currently eight vacancies in government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel