SNP defence spokesman Stewart McDonald said the UK had become an “irresponsible” nuclear power, and claimed the nuclear deterrent is a “big-willy gesture of a small-willy nation”.
McDonald hit out during a Commons debate to mark 50 years of the UK’s continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent. In a division forced by the SNP, not a single Scottish Labour MP voted against nuclear weapons, despite non-renewal of Trident being the policy of Richard Leonard’s party.
McDonald accused Jeremy Corbyn of “selling out” for failing to oppose the Tory government.
“As a long-standing opponent of weapons of mass destruction, Jeremy Corbyn has sold out his own principles by sitting on his hands and failing to walk through the voting lobby with the SNP to oppose this outdated and immoral vanity project,” he said.
The motion celebrating Britain’s nukes was passed by 241 to 33 – with most of the Labour Party abstaining.
READ MORE: Revealed: What Scotland pays for Trident every year
Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson had opened the debate, saying “half a century ago HMS Resolution glided into the Clyde and sailed into the history books” as the first submarine to take part in the mission.
Addressing those who no longer think the UK should have a continuous at-sea presence, he said those who believe it “is simply a Cold War relic” should be reminded that the “the nuclear dangers have not gone away”, saying the “geopolitical situation is more unstable than ever before”.
And Labour agreed – with shadow defence secretary Nia Griffith confirming that Labour is committed to the renewal of Britain’s nuclear submarines.
She said: “The threats facing the UK are real and undiminished. There is a need to deter against the use of nuclear weapons in all circumstances. None of us ever wants to be in a position where the deterrent is used.
“If we ever got to that situation, it would represent a catastrophic failure of our rules-based system and the very concept of deterrence.”
🥀 Jeremy Corbyn abandoned his principles and the majority of Labour MPs voted with the Tories to impose Trident on Scotland against our will.
— The SNP (@theSNP) April 10, 2019
☮️ Nuclear weapons are abhorrent and a huge waste of money. The only way to remove them from Scotland is with independence. pic.twitter.com/8Br0nDctdD
During the summing up of the debate by Labour’s shadow defence minister Wayne David, the SNP were quick to point out that Richard Leonard’s branch office in Scotland are supposed to be opposed to Trident renewal.
“The position of the Scottish Labour Party is the same as the Scottish National Party,” said McDonald. “Can you explain why they’re wrong, and he’s right?”
READ MORE: Strict timetable for getting rid of Trident after independence on SNP agenda
David replied: “I have no doubts whatsoever that this is not a devolved matter. The policy which counts is the policy of the British Labour Party.”
McDonald said that anybody who thought celebrating nuclear weapons in the current time was a good use of House of Commons time was “off their head”.
He said: “Only in this House of Commons, at this time against the backdrop of a major constitutional crisis where each day is worse than the last could it be thought of as a good use of time to back-slap each other on the UK being 50 years as a marine nuclear power.
“Anyone who thinks that is a good use of our time right now, frankly, is off their head.”
READ MORE: REVEALED: MoD's secret plan to dump 22 nuclear submarines in Scotland
McDonald said it is “no surprise” that MPs want to “hark on these symbols of power” at a time where the Prime Minister has “the begging bowl” out in the EU.
He added that there is no military or economic case for a continuous at-sea deterrent, and insisted that the UK had become an “irresponsible” nuclear power.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel