NICOLA Sturgeon is to set out her thinking on a new independence referendum when MSPs head back to Holyrood after the Easter recess.
Speaking just hours after EU leaders signed off on a six-month delay to Brexit, the First Minister said she was ready to make a statement about the implications for Scotland in the “longer term”.
Ironically, the Scottish Parliament is due back after the Easter weekend, which could mean Sturgeon talking about independence on St George’s Day on April 23.
The SNP leader is under pressure from some in her own party to hold a vote sooner rather than later.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon nails the independence argument in one simple tweet
Chris McEleny, a former candidate for depute leader and current SNP councillor, said the First Minister should use the new extension and hold indyref2 in the months leading up to the new Halloween Brexit deadline.
In an interview with Bauer Radio, Sturgeon said: “Obviously we still don’t have clarity about the future of the UK, but I’ve always said that when we got to the end of this phase of negotiations I would set out my thinking on where or what that meant for Scotland.
“Had Parliament been recalled today I would have had the opportunity to make a statement in general about the implications of Brexit, so after the recess I will take stock with the Scottish Parliament about the implications of last night’s developments, what they mean for Scotland in the short term and how the Scottish Parliament can best influence events and hopefully help to stop Brexit in its tracks, and what it means for Scotland in the longer term.”
The SNP leader said she understood the “impatience” of people who like her believed “that the best future for Scotland is to be independent”.
READ MORE: EU elections look to be on – but how best to maximise the indy vote?
She added: “Last night those countries that were deciding the UK’s future, with the UK out of the room, included a dozen countries that have populations smaller than or similar in size to Scotland and yet Scotland and is completely sidelined by Westminster in the whole process.
“Ironically, Brexit, which was all about taking back control for Westminster, has actually highlighted how much power and influence small countries have in the EU.
“The case for independence is stronger than it’s ever been, but we need to do things at the right time and in the right way, because we’ve got to convince a majority, not just of the SNP, but a majority of people in Scotland, that independence is the right choice for the future.”
McEleny, said the First Minister needed to give voters north of the Border the “opportunity to voice their preference on the future they want for Scotland”.
He added: “With a [Brexit] extension to the end of October, we now have the clarity that people required. People in Scotland should be given the opportunity to voice their preference on the future they want for Scotland.
“Before the UK leaves the EU, it is now time to press with everything we have to give the people the opportunity to decide of they want Scotland’s future relationship with the EU decided for them or if they want to take that decision into their own hands by deciding that Scotland should become an independence country.
“An independence referendum in September of this year would give us that opportunity.”
SNP MP Angus MacNeil agreed: “The #Brexit can has been kicked down the road again we cannot follow suit by kicking the #indyref2 can behind it,” he tweeted.
The LibDems disagreed. Willie Rennie hit out at the ruling party: “The SNP should be working with us to deliver a People’s Vote and an end to the constitutional strife that is dividing the UK, not kicking off more chaos of their own making.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel