AS Spanish police officers yesterday continued to blame voters for the violence that accompanied the Catalan independence referendum, a prosecutor has warned lawyers that they should not turn the trial of pro-indy leaders into a hearing against police action in October 2017.
Consuelo Madrigal intervened in the cross-examination of a National Police officer who had tried to stop people voting in Tarragona, by Marina Roig, one of Jordi Cuixart’s legal team.
She warned: “This is not a trial of the police. There are questions that seem to be in a trial against police action in compliance with judicial orders.”
Roig had asked the officer how he and others got into a school being used as a polling station while people were sitting on the ground in front of it: “Is not it more true that they could not enter because they tried by jumping on top of people, stepping on them?”
She was cut short by the prosecutor, along with the presiding judge Manuel Marchena.
He told the defence teams: “Questions do not start from the basis of what the lawyer considers already accredited and from there try to cross the version of the facts that the lawyer has with what the witness has seen.
“The question is to ask the agent what he saw. If you say, ‘there is someone who jumped a barrier’, and he answers for certain and we do not know if it is true or not … I’ve been seeing it for several sessions and I’m trying to see that the questions do not start from a version that is considered accredited.”
National Police witnesses yesterday continued to blame voters and Catalan police, Mossos d’Esquadra, for referendum-day violence.
One said he did not recall a Mossos presence at the polling stations he had been assigned to: “They didn’t act at all,” while another complained that he was injured by “a kick in the hand”.
That officer added: “I hurt myself even more removing people.
“My colleagues got hurt, but I didn’t see the attacks.”
Another agent spoke of a “very violent active resistance” at one polling station, before explaining: “People were more strongly intertwined and there was a lady with a baby carriage.
“When they were retired, I saw a flying umbrella.”
Yet another witness said he saw former education minister, Clara Ponsati at a school, accompanied by two men he claimed were Mossos officers.
He said there was a “very violent atmosphere”, adding: “Voters were very coordinated and organised … they all sat down at once.”
The prosecutor’s office, meanwhile, rejected a petition calling for temporary bail for Jordi Sanchez, Jordi Turull and Josep Rull to take part in interviews and press calls for the elections in which they are standing this month, because of the risk they could “promote violent public demonstrations” similar to those alleged in the trial.
Yesterday also marked 18 months to the day since Sanchez and Cuixart were jailed, ahead of their trial.
They led the two main pro-indy grassroots groups and were jailed on October 16, 2017 – two weeks after the referendum.
Both were accused of sedition, and later rebellion, for their part in organising a demonstration against Spanish police raids on public buildings to disrupt the logistics of the referendum.
Their detention could last for another three months, or to the end of the trial, with a subsequent delay in sentencing.
Under Spanish law, though, preventative prison cannot extend beyond two years.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel