ONE of the world’s leading economists has backed the currency plans unveiled in a report updating the case for independence – saying using the pound would provide “financial stability” for the state.
Professor Andrew Hughes Hallett said “no one could stop” an independent Scotland using the pound and the policy would protect it from any “bad shocks”.
READ MORE: Andrew Hughes Hallett: Stability and flexibility are at the heart of the currency debate
Writing in The National today, he said independent Ireland in 1922 used the pound successfully for a prolonged period without being in a currency union with the UK before moving to its own currency. The policy was also managed despite the country having to deal with years of civil war, he said.
His intervention comes ahead of the SNP’s conference where currency proposals based on Andrew Wilson’s Growth Commission are to be debated. The report recommended continuing to use the pound – outwith a currency union with the UK – until six economic tests are met before moving towards the introduction of a new currency.
However, some in the party’s grassroots demanded an independent Scotland should have its own currency to ensure greater control over economic policy. Derek Mackay and Keith Brown have put down a motion revising Wilson’s plan to give more guarantees over working towards a new currency.
The issue is important for the Yes movement as the policy in 2014 – to keep the pound but in a currency union with the UK – was seen as flawed when the UK said it would not take part in a currency union.
READ MORE: The National View: This is why we're backing the First Minister's currency plan
Hughes Hallet was a member of the Growth Commission and holds important academic and advisory roles. He is an honorary professor in economics at the University of St Andrews; professor of economics at Copenhagen Business School; professor emeritus, economics and public policy at George Mason University; Arlington, USA; senior research fellow at Kings College, University of London and adviser to the European Parliament on economic and monetary affairs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel