TORIES who are representing constituencies around the River Tweed appear to be split over the conservation of salmon in the river.
The leader of Scottish Borders Council, Councillor Shona Haslam, has championed its £11 million purchase of Lowood Estate near Melrose on which up to 400 houses could be built.
A team of consultants representing the owner of the top-quality salmon angling beat of the adjacent Upper Pavilion has now warned that housebuilding on such a massive scale might compromise the River Tweed Special Area of Conservation (SAC) – and salmon is one of the species rating a special mention in the SAC designation.
This finding would appear to put the Tory-led council at variance with Michelle Ballantyne, Conservative list MSP for the South of Scotland, and Tory colleague Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, both of whom have been pressing the Scottish Government for special measures to halt the decline of fish stocks in the Tweed.
Fishing is worth £24m annually to the economy of the Tweed basin.
In a Holyrood debate, Hamilton said: “On the ground, we need to look at the whole ecosystem along the entire course of the river.
“Healthy salmon populations are possibly one of the best indicators of a healthy environment, which every one of us will benefit from.
“If we do not take action now, it will not be only our fragile rural economy that takes the hit in the short term; it will be our fragile environment as a whole in the long term.”
Ballantyne said in the same debate: “At the end of last year, I was asked whether I would be the Scottish Environment LINK species champion for Atlantic salmon and I was delighted to take that on.
“It has been a learning curve – I did not know anything about it when I set out. What I have discovered has led to a number of worries.
“The Atlantic salmon is a keystone species, which means that any decline in stock has a direct and immediate impact on freshwater biodiversity, with the presence of salmon being a useful indicator of the health of our rivers. It is therefore imperative that we work to preserve wild salmon stocks to secure the future of our aquatic ecosystem.”
The influential Borders blog notjustsheepandrugbby.com said: “It is not known whether Mrs Ballantyne and Mrs Hamilton have discussed the potential risk to Tweed salmon stocks from the Lowood development with the Conservative group at Scottish Borders Council.
“As previously reported, the council has chosen to ignore the contents and findings of a comprehensive report, handed to them in March 2018 by a group of consultants headed by Jones Lang LaSalle acting for Upper Pavilion owners Middlemede Properties.”
Official figures show that catches by anglers on the River Tweed last year were at their lowest level ever recorded with only 5510 fish caught, down from 22,718 in 2010. A similar picture of decline is affecting other major salmon rivers.
Hamilton told the Peeblesshire News: “Our rivers are our greatest asset, especially the River Tweed in the Borders. It simply cannot continue that rod catches fall year on year. I want to see angling prosper so that the next generation can have opportunities to contribute to our fantastic Borders rural economy.”
Neither Cllr Haslam or Ballantyne responded to The National’s requests for information and comment.
Hamilton told us: “I am confident that the local authority will carry out due diligence with regard to the environmental impact of the Lowood project including consideration of the River Tweed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel