BBC journalists working on the independence referendum in 2014 lacked “in-depth knowledge” about Scotland and had “a lack of sympathy” for Scottish independence.
This criticism has often been voiced by pro-independence supporters but these latest comments were made by a former BBC staffer, Alistair Burnett, who was involved in the referendum coverage.
READ MORE: BBC ‘back to bad old ways’ on appearance numbers for the SNP
His statements are contained in a special report by the Scottish Centre on European Relations (SCER) and echo the remarks made by veteran BBC journalist Allan Little in a recent BBC documentary about the 2014 referendum.
The section on the media in the SCER report was written by journalist and broadcaster Burnett, who has since left the BBC to work for a major international organisation.
He told The National that in addition to his comments in the report, The Future of Europe: Disruption, Continuity And Change, he also felt the BBC had made a mistake in sending correspondents based in London to cover the referendum campaign in Scotland.
Burnett’s statements have caused SNP depute leader Keith Brown to renew the party’s call for the BBC to address its “persistent failings” in coverage of Scottish affairs.
In the SCER report, Burnett wrote: “In terms of public service broadcasting, the BBC faces its most critical audiences in Scotland, where levels of dissatisfaction with the public broadcaster are higher than elsewhere in the UK.
“This dissatisfaction with the BBC increased during the independence campaign, as the broadcaster was perceived by independence supporters to be failing in its duty to be impartial.
“I was still working at a senior level in BBC News in London at the time and, although I never saw deliberate bias, a lack of in-depth knowledge about Scotland and a lack of sympathy for Scottish independence among many BBC staff were clear and mistakes in coverage were made.”
Little had revealed the ignorance of some BBC staff in London during the independence campaign. As The National reported, he said in the documentary that some of his colleagues believed “that our responsibility was to produce a series of pieces to demonstrate how foolish it would be to vote Yes”.
READ MORE: BBC journalists were out to prove Yes vote was 'foolish' during indyref
Burnett was unwilling to go into detail about his experiences but The National has established from other sources that one BBC staffer wanted to ask former First Minister Alex Salmond if he would fire Trident missiles – it was pointed out that the SNP’s policy has long been to get rid of Trident and all nuclear weapons.
Burnett did tell The National: “I think it was a mistake to send the London Westminster-based correspondents up to Scotland rather than use the people there who in my view did know what they were talking about, such as Brian Taylor. “
SNP depute leader Brown said: “These comments by Alistair Burnett follow on from what Allan Little said about the BBC’s reporting of the 2014 referendum and are true of the BBC’s ongoing problem with covering Scotland properly.
“Twenty years on from the opening of the Scottish Parliament, 11 years on from the King Report and yet still the BBC network regularly falls short when it comes to reporting not just from Scotland but across the nations and regions.
“The corporation’s London-centric view persists. It is vital that the BBC addresses these persistent failings.
“The corporation bosses in London need to be transparent as to how it plans to improve if it is to stand a chance of winning back the trust that they themselves admit they have lost.”
A BBC spokesperson said: “Our audiences in Scotland told us that they wanted more relevant content and that’s why we launched both a new channel, that includes a new daily news programme, and increased the number of network programmes made in Scotland for viewers across the UK.
“That annual £40m investment is the biggest in a generation and we believe it will better serve audiences as well as boost the creative sector in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel