I JOINED the SNP 23 years ago as a “grassroots member”. Since then I’ve been a councillor, council group leader and am at present an MSP. But, most importantly, I am still that same grassroots member.
There is, or should be, no difference between elected members and others in this SNP and Yes family and that’s something we should all remember over the next few weeks, months and years while we contest elections, be they Euros, Westminster, Holyrood, local government or, of course, the forthcoming independence referendum. In my opening paragraph I used the terms “SNP” and “Yes family” advisedly. Like all families there will be some you like better than others, some you disagree with, slightly or more fundamentally, some you’d rather never hear from again and, unfortunately, occasionally there are some whose behaviour is so beyond the pale that they are no longer considered as part of the family.
READ MORE: This is what SNP figures really think about 'War on Cybernats'
Over the last week there has been some undoubted falling out within the family.
I have known for many years the three SNP members quoted in The Herald On Sunday. They are hard-working, conscientious, committed nationalists and I am sure they were unaware of how their comments would be used to attack tens of thousands of dedicated Yes activists.
I have no doubt they were unaware that The Herald On Sunday would, for the second year in a row (the first was back in the Sunday Herald days), write a front page to attempt to deflect from and deflate the amazing success of the Glasgow march, a peaceful march of approximately 100,000 committed activists that was conducted with great dignity, despite the best efforts of a pathetic handful of abusive protesters.
That should have been the front page, not this desperate attempt to create a split in the Yes movement. And we in the Yes movement, including us in the SNP, should keep at the forefront of our mind.
Families have fall-outs. They say stupid things sometimes, they argue over things said but generally they make up and look after each other, even when they don’t necessarily agree. I’m not sure we’ve seen enough of that recently.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson: Why a positive campaign will be key to winning independence
It sometimes appears we’re quick to tarnish a huge group of good people for the actions of a fringe few, yet at the same time forget to mention the abuse that ordinary members of the Yes movement receive on a regular basis.
SNP politicians have also been on the end of this abuse, much more so than any I have seen reported as being received by politicians from other parties. For the FM, Humza Yousaf, Joanna Cherry and others, including myself, the abuse has included death threats, threats of assaults, personal abuse and attempts to physically harm. I have revealed details of some of them today in this newspaper.
Now, I’m not for a second suggesting there isn’t a fringe of nasty, abusive apparently Yes people on Twitter – and I’m happy if we call them out – but maybe, just maybe, we would all feel better if the same determination and vigour was used to highlight the attacks on our side.
After all, the first responsibility of family surely, is to look after each other, particularly when under threat.
Here’s what I’d like to see us do: be wary about requests to comment on our supporters; weed out the minute number of serial abusers on Twitter (and I don’t mean those who hold opposing views or use what a friend of mine used to call “industrial language”); look after our own when they are attacked but primarily remember the “grassroots” are not someone else, they are us.
Without them the Yes movement and the SNP are nothing. Everything we have at present is owed to them.
So I urge the movement let’s put the last week behind us, treat each other with respect and remember … whenever we need comfort and support we always tend to go back to our roots.
After all that’s what family is all about!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel