LOGIC has never been the strong point of some Unionists. From telling Scotland that staying in the UK is the “only way to guarantee EU membership” to telling us that there is no mandate for a second Scottish independence referendum.
Now they are at it again, desperately trying to formulate any argument which will “prove” that last week’s European Parliament election was not a win for the SNP.
The latest attempt involves maths – and you can’t argue with maths, right? – to show us all that barely anyone in Scotland backs a second independence referendum.
The argument goes: there are 4,105,800 eligible voters in Scotland – which includes all those EU citizens who were denied their democratic right vote – and, on a turnout of 38.2%, this means that 1,568,242 people voted in Scotland last Thursday.
READ MORE: Scandal as EU citizens are refused right to vote in European Election
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson attempts to spin crushing defeat for Scottish Tories
READ MORE: Anger at BBC over European election coverage of Scotland
Of those, 611,614 cast their ballot in favour of the SNP.
The conclusion these desperate Unionists then reach is that 14.9% of Scotland backed the SNP and, by extension, a second independence referendum.
4,105,800 (Scottish electorate).
— Cllr G McGinnigle (@Graeme__mcg) May 27, 2019
1,568,242 (votes cast Scotland).
Only 38.2% voted.
The snp took 39% of the votes cast.
611,614 people voted for the snp.
That works out at only 14.9% of "Scotland" backed the snp.
Now, tell me again about how independence is coming 🤔
We’re not sure where to begin with this, so let’s get the obvious one out the way...
Now, for the avoidance of doubt, the yellow bits on the map of Scotland denote the council areas in which the SNP took the most votes.
The Tories are represented by all the dark blue bits you can’t see anywhere on the Scottish map – or England and Wales, for that matter.
We are also aware that the terms “win” and victory” can be interpreted, stretched and moulded by political leaders to fit their agenda – hence why you often have multiple sides claiming they have won.
But we seriously can’t see any way in which this can’t be interpreted as a win for the SNP.
The number of seats gained and share of the vote are two metrics often used.
The SNP took three of the six Scottish MEP seats, more than any other party, and took 37.8% of the vote in Scotland, more than any other party.
They also secured a higher share of the vote in 30 of the 32 council areas.
For context, the Brexit Party came in second with 14.8%, followed by the Scottish LibDems (remember them?) on 13.9%, the Scottish Tories on 11.6% and Scottish Labour on 9.3%.
These results are based on an increased turnout of 39.9%, up from 33.5% in 2014.
So the SNP’s share of the Scottish vote was up on a higher turnout, and their share of the UK vote was up on a higher turnout.
We’re not claiming it was a groundbreaking result that caused political earthquakes, but it is an SNP victory nonetheless.
Even if we were to accept this deluded logic, then what does that say about the Scottish Tory result? Or the UK Tory result? Or the Tory result at the last General Election?
Exactly what you’d expect.
*clears throat*
So, there are 4,105,800 eligible voters in Scotland and, on a turnout of 38.2%, this means that 1,568,242 people voted in Scotland last Thursday.
Of those, 182,476 cast their ballot in favour of the Scottish Tories, which works out as 4.4% of the vote.
Which means that a measly 4.4%% back the Scottish Tories and their call to rule out a second referendum.
That’s some mandate to block a second independence referendum...
And what if we apply this to the UK result as a whole?
There are roughly 46.9 million eligible voters in the UK and on a turnout of 50.9%, this means that the 1,512,147 who backed the Tories – who, let’s remember, finished in FIFTH place – amounts to just 3.22% backing the party currently running the UK.
It doesn’t look much better when we assess at the result of the last General Election, in which the Tories won the backing of fewer than 30% of the electorate.
Which means that well under a third of UK voters don’t back Tory austerity, they don’t back tax cuts for the rich, and they don't back a Tory Brexit.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel