RICHARD Leonard has insisted he will not stand down as leader of Scottish Labour, despite taking the party to fifth place in the European elections.
His refusal to quit came as the party imploded yesterday with two frontbench resignations and calls for him to consider his position.
READ MORE: Kevin McKenna: Scottish Labour need a new strategy on independence
Neil Findlay, a Leonard loyalist and Eurosceptic, was the first to go, and he also announced plans to stand down as an MSP in 2021.
In his resignation letter, the veteran left-winger, who was the brains behind the disastrous push for votes in the Euros, said he had been thinking about quitting for the past six months.
He also called for an end to the party’s “eternal, internal fighting” and “the toxic culture of leaks and briefings that come from some within the Scottish and UK parliamentary groups”.
Findlay, who was Jeremy Corbyn’s campaign manager in Scotland, said the “self-inflicted harm” caused by infighting had to stop.
“Our party members and our leadership teams deserve so much better,” he added.
“Scottish Labour will win again when the focus is on the public, not the internal politics of the parliamentary group.”
Findlay went on to say that the party needed a “clear and easily understood position on the constitution” and that the social and economic policies being pursued by Leonard and Corbyn are “100% correct”.
On his Twitter feed, he explained to his followers that he was going because “there is a big world outside the Holyrood bubble, life is too short to be involved in endless internal battles with people who are supposed to be on the same side”.
Hours later, Daniel Johnson, the party’s justice spokesman, resigned for very different reasons.
He said his Edinburgh Southern constituency voted 80% Remain and were clear “not only that we must have another referendum, but that we must make every effort to ensure the UK remains a member of the EU. That is a view I share.”
He added: “Quite simply, I do not feel I can represent my constituents effectively unless I can articulate and represent this view.
“I do not believe that I can do this from the frontbench under the current direction and leadership of this party.”
His resignation came despite comments from Leonard on Monday night when he said he was “humbled by the scale of the defeat”, and gave his backing to holding another referendum on Brexit.
Labour took less than 10% of the vote in Scotland at the European elections, losing both their MEPs. It was the party’s worst result since 1910.
READ MORE: Five of the best gaffes by Scottish Labour's Neil Findlay
Earlier, in an interview with BBC Radio Scotland, Scottish Labour’s longest-serving MP, Ian Murray, was asked if Leonard or Findlay should consider their positions.
Murray said: “It’s up to them to consider their own positions. They’ll decide whether or not they’re in the best position to take forward the Scottish Labour party.
“I know many of the members who have spoken to me since the results yesterday have been decidedly angry, and decided that they perhaps voted for Richard in the leadership election and maybe they’ve changed their mind now.
“It’s about time that they showed some leadership and brought that forward.”
In his reply to Findlay’s resignation letter, Leonard said: “Tony Benn famously left the House of Commons to spend more time on politics, and I am sure that this approach will be a very good precedent for the next phase of your contribution.”
SNP Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf paid tribute to Johnson, describing him as “formidable”.
He tweeted: “They are abandoning a sinking ship. Truly does feel like an existential moment for Scottish Labour.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel