SCOTTISH Labour’s implosion continued yesterday as Anas Sarwar took another swipe at party chiefs.
In an open letter to members, the Glasgow MSP slated leaders over the internal divisions and lack of clear direction, which he said were causes of its humiliation in the European Parliament elections.
The message, directed at Labour members in the city he represents, stated that “the factionalism and division needs to stop” and said those responsible for the lacklustre election campaign “have chosen to lash out and attack their own colleagues”.
It goes on: “The newsfeeds and social media accounts that believe they speak for the leadership need to understand the damage they do to it and the wider party by constantly baiting and attacking our own.
“The leadership must decide whether they speak for a clique or faction or whether they speak for all of our party and aspire to speak for the country.
“They must do more than just say we are a broad church movement. They must demonstrate it with actions and deeds. They must reach out and do so urgently.
“Our country is deeply divided, inequality and poverty are on the rise, and the perpetrators of hate are fuelling prejudice.”
He added: “We desperately need a Scottish Labour Party that can rise to this challenge.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour implodes after disastrous European elections
But when asked if he would launch an official challenge to Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard, Sarwar stated: “Categorically no.”
Labour polled just 9% in Scotland in the Brussels vote, and frontbenchers Neil Findlay and Daniel Johnson quit their party positions in the wake of the result.
Earlier this week, Jamie Glackin, a former chairman, said Labour is “essentially on life support at the moment and facing a terminal decline in Scotland”.
In his letter, Sarwar – who ran against Leonard to succeed Kezia Dugdale – expressed “disappointment” at the loss of long-serving MEP David Martin and said Findlay will be “sorely missed”.
He went on: “We can only advocate unity to the country if we demonstrate unity in our party.
“That’s why the factionalism and division needs to stop. That is a responsibility for all of us, but the culture is set at the top and leadership must come from there too.”
The intervention comes ahead of a meeting of Labour’s Scottish executive committee next Saturday.
Leonard said: “The result of the European election was humbling for Labour across the UK and as Scottish Labour leader, it is my job to reflect on that and how the party moves forward together.
“That is why I quickly made it clear that we will back a confirmatory vote on Brexit and campaign to Remain.”
Meanwhile, Pete Willsman, who sits on Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC), has been suspended after allegedly stating that the party’s anti-Semitism row had been “whipped up” by the Israeli embassy after it directed rabbis to complain.
He is accused of telling Tuvia Tenenbom, an American-Israeli author: “It’s almost certain who is behind all this anti-Semitism against Jeremy [Corbyn], almost certainly it’s the Israeli embassy.”
Comments said to have been made by Willsman emerged in a recording obtained by broadcaster LBC.
Jewish groups and MPs have called for his expulsion and a party spokeswoman said: “Peter Willsman has been suspended from the Labour Party, pending investigation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel