TORY leadership hopeful Sajid Javid has refused to rule out extending the UK’s departure from the European Union beyond the end of October.
The Home Secretary, who is among 13 candidates vying to replace Theresa May, said he did not want to delay Brexit but would not ignore Parliament if it forced his hand.
It follows reports that Environment Secretary Michael Gove told colleagues he is prepared to delay Brexit until the end of next year rather than leave without a deal on October 31.
“I’m clear that my plan would be to leave on October 31. I want to leave with a deal but if I have to choose between no deal and no Brexit I would pick no deal,” Javid told BBC One’s The Andrew Marr Show.
Pressed on delaying Brexit, he said: “That’s not something I would do, but we are a parliamentary democracy and what we’ve seen in the last few months is Parliament has taken on some extraordinary powers to initiate its own legislation so if it’s statute, if it’s the law, I would not break the law if I was Prime Minister, of course I would observe the law.”
READ MORE: Ian Blackford: ‘Scots must have choice on independent future’
The Cabinet minister also said he had been working with the Border Force to find an alternative arrangement to the Irish backstop to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic. He explained: “In my department at the moment I’ve got Border Force and we’ve done work for months on what an alternative to that arrangement could look like and what’s missing is that goodwill.
“What I would do is make a grand gesture to Ireland that we would cover all their costs – the upfront costs, the running costs – of a new digitised border.
“I think it could be done in a couple of years but I think we could cover their costs.”
Javid’s comments came as Andrea Leadsom, whose resignation as Commons leader triggered the PM’s departure, said she would not seek to renegotiate May’s deal and vowed to leave the EU by the end of October in a “managed exit”.
She said she would not take the UK out of the EU without a deal, instead insisting she would follow her “three-step plan for a managed exit”.
“I think it’s based on the premise that, number one, we have to leave the EU at the end of October, and, number two, the Withdrawal Agreement Bill is dead – the EU won’t reopen the withdrawal agreement and the UK Parliament won’t vote for it,” she told Marr.
Leadsom also ruled out holding a general election this year and said she would not support a second referendum or an alliance with the Brexit Party.
READ MORE: Tories under pressure to hold inquiry into ‘shambolic’ EU election
Meanwhile, Justice Secretary David Gauke said he would support International Development Secretary Rory Stewart in the race to replace May, saying he had “real strengths” in being an unconventional candidate.
Gauke also said he would not be able to serve in a cabinet which pursued leaving without a deal as its “objective”.
Stewart also won support from Tory former chancellor Ken Clarke, while former Cabinet minister Nicky Morgan said she would back Gove.
Former universities minister Sam Gyimah became the latest Tory MP to announce his intention to replace May, saying he would broaden the race.
Brexit Party MEP Ann Widdecombe said the Tories, her former party, had “gone mad” in fielding so many candidates.
Elsewhere, Health Secretary Matt Hancock wrote to MPs setting out his “Brexit Delivery Plan”, saying a no-deal exit was “not an available choice” to the next PM.
He said he would seek a time limit to the Irish backstop, set up an Irish Border Council, and propose a “Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement” as the basis of the UK’s long-term relationship with the EU.
Meanwhile, according to a Sunday Times report, Gove has the support of four of the Scottish Tories’ 13 MPs.
The paper said Luke Graham, Stephen Kerr, Bill Grant and David Duguid have joined the Gove camp, while Andrew Bowie and Paul Masterton are backing Hancock.
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt was in Edinburgh yesterday to try and drum up support, following Stewart’s visit to Scotland on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel