IF you want to get yourself favoured by the BBC’s political programme editors then it appears that all you have to do is form a new party or split up an existing one.
For despite being the third largest party in the House of Commons, the SNP had to play third fiddle to the Brexit Party and the Change UK/The Independent Group when it came to guest appearances on BBC political shows during the month of May, which, lest we forget, was an election month and therefore covered by the rules set by the broadcasting regulator Ofcom.
How can it be possible that the new kids on the block got equal or more guest appearances than the SNP?
READ MORE: SNP may report BBC to Ofcom over Tory bias in political shows
There were other happenings during the month which the BBC will no doubt argue skewed their political coverage such as resignation of Prime Minister Theresa May, but did the Tories really deserve to have nearly as many appearances on five political programmes than all the other parties combined?
Some readers may ask why is the SNP complaining about the lack of fair coverage.
The answer can be found in the Corporation’s approach to the coverage of the 2014 Independence referendum.
LISTEN: Wee Ginger Dugcast: Spanish veto, Natalie McGarry and Nigel Farage
For whatever reason, the BBC and other broadcasters concluded that the normal rules on fair coverage did not apply as it wasn’t an election.
Senior SNP and Yes movement leaders are determined that there will be no repeat of that situation when the second referendum takes place.
The “due weight” rules of Ofcom must be followed by all broadcasters during the referendum run-up.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel