Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson has backed Sajid Javid's campaign to be the next leader of the Conservative party.
Davidson claims the Home Secretary's life "embodies the Conservative values of aspiration, education, opportunity, hard work and just reward".
But Communities Secretary James Brokenshire gave his backing to Boris Johnson, saying he has the "character, the ingenuity, the resilience and an ability to convey a compelling message".
The support of Davidson was welcomed by Javid.
"Ruth knows a winner when she sees one," he told the Mail on Sunday.
The Home Secretary set out plans to use hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money to fund Irish border technology in an effort to achieve a Brexit breakthrough, saying there was a moral duty on the UK.
"I think it's morally justified to pay for that because we both have signed the Good Friday Agreement, we are both absolutely committed to peace on the island of Ireland and - given that we voted to leave and that's what's changing the status quo on the island of Ireland - I think it's morally right that we say, 'look, we'll pay because we've caused this'."
Meanwhile Brokenshire told the Mail on Sunday that Johnson will "drive an optimistic One Nation vision beyond Brexit on schools, hospitals, jobs and the economy, enabling greater prosperity and opportunity".
Rory Stewart's camp said he is the challenger best placed to take on Johnson, pointing to polling by Opinium which shows him neck-and-neck with the former foreign secretary on the question of "would they make a good prime minister".
An ally of the International Development Secretary said: "It's clear - this polling shows Rory Stewart is the people's candidate and is the ideal person to go up against Boris in the final two."
Earlier, Dominic Raab said the possibility of suspending Parliament - possibly dragging the Queen into a constitutional row - should not be ruled out in order to secure Brexit.
The Tory leadership contender said it was "very unlikely" it would be necessary to prorogue Parliament in order to prevent MPs blocking a no-deal Brexit, but taking the option off the table would be a mistake.
Raab said it was a "test of nerve" and his rivals would weaken the UK's position in negotiations with Brussels by ruling out options to guarantee Brexit.
Critics of the approach have warned prorogation would involve the Queen in a constitutional crisis, because formally it is the monarch who ends a session of Parliament.
Bur Raab said it is unlikely to come to that because MPs' powers to block a no-deal Brexit are limited.
Pointing to Institute for Government analysis, he said it would be much more difficult "for Parliament to engage in the guerrilla warfare sabotage of a government" that was resolved to leave by October 31.
But in a message to his rivals - and an appeal to hardline Brexiteers on the Tory benches to back his campaign - Raab said it is necessary to demonstrate a willingness to take such measures.
"I think it's wrong to rule out any tool to make sure that we leave by the end of October," he told BBC Radio 4's Today.
"The exam question in this contest is 'who can be trusted to lead us out by the end of October and end this paralysing uncertainty'."
Raab said he would go back to Brussels with a "best, final offer" including the removal of the Irish backstop, but said there could be no further delay and the UK would be prepared to leave without a deal, falling back on World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules.
"I think anyone who is talking about delay or who is taking WTO off the table is having the perverse effect of weakening our negotiating position in Brussels, that's the lesson of the last three years," he said.
"It's a test of nerve here and if candidates cannot stand up their resolve to lead us out by the end of October in a leadership contest, what chance would they have under the heat of the negotiations in Brussels?"
Following Theresa May's formal resignation as Tory leader on Friday, the starting gun has been fired for the race to replace her.
The nomination process will take place on Monday, with candidates requiring eight MPs to back them in order to enter the race, with the first round of voting on Thursday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel